Literature DB >> 10369848

Prevention of implantable-defibrillator shocks by treatment with sotalol. d,l-Sotalol Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Study Group.

A Pacifico1, S H Hohnloser, J H Williams, B Tao, S Saksena, P D Henry, E N Prystowsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators often receive adjunctive antiarrhythmic therapy to prevent frequent shocks. We tested the efficacy and safety of sotalol, a beta-blocker with class III antiarrhythmic effects, for this purpose.
METHODS: In a multicenter trial, patients were stratified according to left ventricular ejection fraction (< or =0.30 or >0.30), randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with 160 to 320 mg of sotalol per day (151 patients) or matching placebo (151 patients), and followed for 12 months. Kaplan-Meier analyses of the time to an event were performed. Three end points were used: the delivery of a first shock for any reason or death from any cause, the first appropriate shock for a ventricular arrhythmia or death from any cause, and the first inappropriate shock for a supraventricular arrhythmia or death from any cause.
RESULTS: Compliance with double-blind treatment was similar in the two groups. There were seven deaths in the placebo group and four in the sotalol group. As compared with placebo, treatment with sotalol was associated with a lower risk of death from any cause or the delivery of a first shock for any reason (reduction in risk, 48 percent; P<0.001 by the log-rank test), death from any cause or the delivery of a first appropriate shock (reduction in risk, 44 percent; P=0.007), or death from any cause or the delivery of a first inappropriate shock (reduction in risk, 64 percent; P=0.004). Sotalol also reduced the mean (+/-SD) frequency of shocks due to any cause (1.43+/-3.53 shocks per year, as compared with 3.89+/-10.65 in the placebo group; P=0.008). In the sotalol group, the reduction in the risk of death from any cause or the delivery of a first shock for any reason did not differ significantly between patients with ejection fractions of more than 0.30 and those with ejection fractions of 0.30 or less.
CONCLUSIONS: Oral sotalol was safe and efficacious in reducing the risk of death or the delivery of a first defibrillator shock whether or not ventricular function was depressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10369848     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199906173402402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  56 in total

1.  How well is the clinical importance of study results reported? An assessment of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  K B Chan; M Man-Son-Hing; F J Molnar; A Laupacis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.

Authors:  D T Connelly
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Redefining the role of antiarrhythmic drugs in the management of ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  D Mehta
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs and implantable devices in controlling ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation.

Authors:  Yadavendra S Rajawat; Darryl Dias; Edward P Gerstenfeld; Sanjay Dixit; Bindi Shah; Andrea M Russo; Francis E Marchlinski
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Recollection of pain due to inappropriate versus appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

Authors:  Gregory M Marcus; Derrick W Chan; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  [Pharmacological therapy for ventricular arrhythmias: evidence for current treatment strategies and perspectives for the future].

Authors:  F T Wegener; G C Grönefeld; G Duray; J R Ehrlich; S H Hohnloser
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 7.  Approach to antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with ICDs and frequent activations.

Authors:  Arnold Pinter; Paul Dorian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Adjunctive therapy for recurrent ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  James A Reiffel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  A benefit-risk assessment of class III antiarrhythmic agents.

Authors:  Bente Brendorp; Oledyg Pedersen; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Naji Sahebzadah; Lars Køber
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  Ventricular tachycardia inducibility after radiofrequency ablation affects the outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: The role of left ventricular function.

Authors:  Andrea Colella; Marzia Giaccardi; Raffaele Molino Lova; Carmine Liccardi; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.