Literature DB >> 10369799

The renal endothelin system in the Prague hypertensive rat, a new model of spontaneous hypertension.

V Vogel1, A Bäcker, J Heller, H J Kramer.   

Abstract

In a new model of spontaneous hypertension, namely the Prague hypertensive rat (PHR), hypertension is transferred with a kidney transplanted from the PHR to its normotensive counterpart (PNR) by an as yet unknown mechanism. One candidate may be endothelin (ET), since this potent vasoconstrictor affects vascular tone, renal haemodynamics and renal excretory function, and all members of this peptide family are located within the kidney and act in an autocrine/paracrine fashion. In the present study we investigated, in the renal tissue of PHRs and PNRs: (1) preproET-1 and preproET-3 mRNAs as well as ET-1 and ET-3 peptide distribution, (2) endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE)-1 mRNA expression, and (3) ET receptors and their characteristics in membranes of glomeruli and papillae. In addition, plasma ET concentration and urinary ET excretion were determined. Quantitative measurements by competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction revealed ET-1 mRNA levels in the renal cortex from PHRs and PNRs of 1.09+/-0.13 and 1. 29+/-0.18 amol/microgram of total RNA respectively, and in red medulla of 2.72+/-0.82 and 3.30+/-0.68 amol/microgram respectively. In contrast, renal papilla from PHRs showed significantly lower levels of preproET-1 mRNA (1.81+/-0.64 amol/microgram of total RNA, compared with 4.25+/-0.82 amol/microgram in PNRs; each n=5; P<0.05). The ET-1 peptide concentration in papillary tissue was also significantly lower in PHRs than in PNRs (120.2+/-30.8 and 491.3+/-53.4 fmol/mg of protein respectively; n=5; P<0.01), whereas it was similar in cortex and medulla from PHRs and PNRs. The preproET-3 mRNA content in renal tissue was much lower than that of preproET-1 mRNA. It was significantly higher in red medulla from PHRs compared with that from PNRs (0.25+/-0.05 and 0.13+/-0.02 amol/microgram of total RNA respectively; P<0.05), but was similar in papillae of PHRs and PNRs (0.04+/-0.02 and 0.05+/-0.01 amol/microgram respectively; n=5). Cortical preproET-3 mRNA was at the lower limit of detection. Similarly, the ET-3 peptide concentration was slightly but significantly higher in the red medulla of PHRs compared with PNRs (15.4+/-2.0 and 8.8+/-0.8 fmol/mg of protein respectively; n=5; P<0. 05), whereas no differences in ET-3 peptide concentration were found in papillae from PHRs and PNRs. ECE-1 mRNA levels were similar in the renal cortex, red medulla and papillae from PHRs and PNRs, ranging between 0.34+/-0.03 and 0.56+/-0.12 amol/microgram of total RNA. Of the total ET receptors in glomerular membranes, 39% were ETA receptors, whereas papillary membranes contained exclusively ETB receptors. PHRs and PNRs showed similar Bmax and Kd values for ET-1 in renal glomerular membranes (Bmax, 6.5+/-1.3 and 4.9+/-1.2 pmol/mg of protein respectively; Kd, 0.69+/-0.10 and 0.56+/-0.10 nM respectively) and papillary membranes (Bmax, 9.7+/-1.1 and 11.3+/-1. 6 pmol/mg of protein respectively; Kd, 0.30+/-0.04 and 0.42+/-0.07 nM respectively). Plasma ET-1/2 concentrations (10.4+/-1.3 and 12. 2+/-1.2 fmol/ml in PHRs and PNRs respectively) and urinary ET-1 excretion (3.1+/-0.3 and 3.0+/-0.2 pmol/24 h in PHRs and PNRs respectively) were similar in hypertensive and normotensive rats. In summary, although tissue levels of preproET-3 mRNA were very low in the kidney, significantly greater amounts of preproET-3 mRNA and ET-3 peptide were found in medullary tissue from PHRs compared with PNRs, a finding that awaits further investigation. In contrast, the preproET-1 mRNA content and ET-1 peptide concentration were significantly lower in papillary tissue from PHRs compared with PNRs. Decreased synthesis of ET-1, which normally antagonizes the action of [Arg8]vasopressin, may allow increased water (and sodium) reabsorption at the level of the inner medullary collecting duct. This intrinsic defect of the kidney in the PHR may contribute to hypertension in this model, and may transmit high blood pressure on transplantation of the 'hypertensive' kidney i

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10369799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)        ISSN: 0143-5221            Impact factor:   6.124


  7 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of endothelin and the kidney.

Authors:  Donald E Kohan; Edward W Inscho; Donald Wesson; David M Pollock
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 9.090

Review 2.  Regulation of blood pressure and salt homeostasis by endothelin.

Authors:  Donald E Kohan; Noreen F Rossi; Edward W Inscho; David M Pollock
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 3.  Contrasting actions of endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Markus P Schneider; Erika I Boesen; David M Pollock
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.820

4.  Collecting duct-specific knockout of endothelin-1 causes hypertension and sodium retention.

Authors:  Dowhan Ahn; Yuqiang Ge; Peter K Stricklett; Pritmohinder Gill; Deborah Taylor; Alisa K Hughes; Masashi Yanagisawa; Lance Miller; Raoul D Nelson; Donald E Kohan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Role of collecting duct endothelin in control of renal function and blood pressure.

Authors:  Donald E Kohan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension.

Authors:  Daniel Levy; Georg B Ehret; Kenneth Rice; Germaine C Verwoert; Lenore J Launer; Abbas Dehghan; Nicole L Glazer; Alanna C Morrison; Andrew D Johnson; Thor Aspelund; Yurii Aulchenko; Thomas Lumley; Anna Köttgen; Ramachandran S Vasan; Fernando Rivadeneira; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Xiuqing Guo; Dan E Arking; Gary F Mitchell; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Albert V Smith; Kent Taylor; Robert B Scharpf; Shih-Jen Hwang; Eric J G Sijbrands; Joshua Bis; Tamara B Harris; Santhi K Ganesh; Christopher J O'Donnell; Albert Hofman; Jerome I Rotter; Josef Coresh; Emelia J Benjamin; André G Uitterlinden; Gerardo Heiss; Caroline S Fox; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Eric Boerwinkle; Thomas J Wang; Vilmundur Gudnason; Martin G Larson; Aravinda Chakravarti; Bruce M Psaty; Cornelia M van Duijn
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs).

Authors:  David C Kaelber; Ashish K Jha; Douglas Johnston; Blackford Middleton; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.