OBJECTIVE: To study meibomian gland function in dry eyes using meibometry. METHODS: Forty-two patients with clinically diagnosed dry eye that was reclassified as meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD [n = 12]), aqueous-tear deficiency (AD [n = 10]), MGD combined with AD (n = 2), "incomplete" dry eye (n = 12), and non-dry eye (6 eyes) were compared with 41 healthy control subjects. The following 2 techniques of meibometry were applied: direct meibometry (DM) measuring lipid imprints using the Meibometer, and integrated meibometry (IM) using image-scanning and computer densitometry. Tear film lipid layer thickness was assessed using interference microscopy. RESULTS: Imprints were homogeneous for all subjects except those with MGD. Mean+/-SE readings on results of DM were 127.24+/-24.4 for MGD, 306.4+/-9.2 for AD, 248.6+/-13.2 for incomplete dry eye, and 268.5+/-6.3 for controls, showing lower values in the MGD group relative to all others (P<.001). Results of IM gave similar results (P<.001, P =.01, and P<.001, respectively). Lipid layers appeared lower for the MGD group than others. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with controls, lid lipid levels are reduced in patients with MGD, and increased in women with AD. Lipid layer thickness is increased in women with AD compared with patients with MGD. Both meibometric techniques may be useful for evaluating MGD. Although DM requires special equipment (the Meibometer), it provides a record of immediate diagnostic value. Although IM is less effective than DM, it offers visual documentation of the lipid imprint, which may itself be of diagnostic value, and uses equipment available in many laboratories.
OBJECTIVE: To study meibomian gland function in dry eyes using meibometry. METHODS: Forty-two patients with clinically diagnosed dry eye that was reclassified as meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD [n = 12]), aqueous-tear deficiency (AD [n = 10]), MGD combined with AD (n = 2), "incomplete" dry eye (n = 12), and non-dry eye (6 eyes) were compared with 41 healthy control subjects. The following 2 techniques of meibometry were applied: direct meibometry (DM) measuring lipid imprints using the Meibometer, and integrated meibometry (IM) using image-scanning and computer densitometry. Tear film lipid layer thickness was assessed using interference microscopy. RESULTS: Imprints were homogeneous for all subjects except those with MGD. Mean+/-SE readings on results of DM were 127.24+/-24.4 for MGD, 306.4+/-9.2 for AD, 248.6+/-13.2 for incomplete dry eye, and 268.5+/-6.3 for controls, showing lower values in the MGD group relative to all others (P<.001). Results of IM gave similar results (P<.001, P =.01, and P<.001, respectively). Lipid layers appeared lower for the MGD group than others. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with controls, lid lipid levels are reduced in patients with MGD, and increased in women with AD. Lipid layer thickness is increased in women with AD compared with patients with MGD. Both meibometric techniques may be useful for evaluating MGD. Although DM requires special equipment (the Meibometer), it provides a record of immediate diagnostic value. Although IM is less effective than DM, it offers visual documentation of the lipid imprint, which may itself be of diagnostic value, and uses equipment available in many laboratories.
Authors: Alan Tomlinson; Anthony J Bron; Donald R Korb; Shiro Amano; Jerry R Paugh; E Ian Pearce; Richard Yee; Norihiko Yokoi; Reiko Arita; Murat Dogru Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-03-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: J Daniel Nelson; Jun Shimazaki; Jose M Benitez-del-Castillo; Jennifer P Craig; James P McCulley; Seika Den; Gary N Foulks Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-03-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Erich Knop; Nadja Knop; Thomas Millar; Hiroto Obata; David A Sullivan Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-03-30 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Sin Man Lam; Louis Tong; Bastien Reux; Xinrui Duan; Andrea Petznick; Siew Sian Yong; Cynthia Boo Shiao Khee; Martin J Lear; Markus R Wenk; Guanghou Shui Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 5.922