Literature DB >> 10369424

Repaglinide versus glyburide: a one-year comparison trial.

T Marbury1, W C Huang, P Strange, H Lebovitz.   

Abstract

This prospective, 1-year, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study was designed to show that repaglinide was at least equivalent to glyburide in patients with type 2 diabetes. Five hundred and seventy-six patients with type 2 diabetes of at least 6 months' duration were randomized to receive monotherapy with repaglinide (n = 383) or glyburide (n = 193). During weeks 1-8, doses were gradually increased to achieve a target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) range of 80-140 mg/dl. The final adjusted dose was maintained for 12 months. Repaglinide patients received a starting dose of 0.5 mg three times/day preprandially, adjusted as necessary to 1, 2 or 4 mg before breakfast, lunch and dinner. Glyburide patients received a starting dose of 2.5 mg before breakfast and placebo before lunch and dinner. Glyburide was increased as necessary to 5 or 10 mg before breakfast (placebo before lunch and dinner) or to 15 mg (10 mg before breakfast, placebo before lunch, and 5 mg before dinner). After study drug was stopped, patients were transferred to an appropriate therapy, as recommended by the investigator. Efficacy was assessed by changes from baseline in glycemic control parameters and in C-peptide, insulin, and lipid profiles. Repaglinide provided glycemic control that was at least as effective and potentially safer than that provided by glyburide. The glucose-lowering effect of repaglinide was most pronounced in pharmacotherapy-naive patients, who showed rapid and marked decreases in mean glycosylated hemoglobin levels from baseline (9.4%) to month 3 (7.6%) and month 12 (7.9%). Mean FPG levels also decreased overall in this group, from 222 mg/dl at baseline, to 175 mg/dl at month 3, to 188 mg/dl at month 12. At endpoint, morning C-peptide levels had increased significantly in glyburide-treated patients compared with those treated with repaglinide, but morning fasting insulin levels did not differ significantly between the two groups. Repaglinide efficacy was sustained over 1 year and was not influenced by age or sex. Overall safety and changes in lipid profile and body weight were similar with both agents, with no significant change after extended pharmacotherapy. Weight gain data for the subset of pharmacotherapy-naïve patients suggest that patients given repaglinide may gain less weight than those given glyburide. Repaglinide, at doses of 0.5-4.0 mg administered three times preprandially, was well tolerated and provided safe and consistently effectiveglycemic control during this 1-year study. Patients using repaglinide received the same therapeutic benefits as those using glyburide, and may have received additional benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10369424     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00002-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  29 in total

Review 1.  Modern pharmacotherapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  S H Hsia
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 2.  [The COMBO project. Criteria and guidelines for combined therapy of type 2 diabetes. Consensus document (and II)].

Authors:  A Goday Arno; A Goday Arno; F Alvarez Guisasola; J Díez Espino; I Fernández Fernández; D Tórtola Graner; D Acosta Delgado; M Aguilar Diosdado; J Herrera Pombo; L Felipe Pallardo
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-03-31       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Population PKPD modelling of the long-term hypoglycaemic effect of gliclazide given as a once-a-day modified release (MR) formulation.

Authors:  N Frey; C Laveille; M Paraire; M Francillard; N H G Holford; Roeline Jochemsen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Dose selection using a semi-mechanistic integrated glucose-insulin-glucagon model: designing phase 2 trials for a novel oral glucokinase activator.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Karen Schneck; Juliana Bue-Valleskey; Kwee Poo Yeo; Michael Heathman; Vikram Sinha
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Improved post-prandial ghrelin response by nateglinide or acarbose therapy contributes to glucose stability in Type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  F Zheng; X Yin; W Lu; J Zhou; H Yuan; H Li
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  Repaglinide: a review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Cardiovascular outcomes in trials of oral diabetes medications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Shari Bolen; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Crystal Wiley; Lisa M Wilson; Spyridon S Marinopoulos; Leonard Feldman; Jason Vassy; Renee Wilson; Eric B Bass; Frederick L Brancati
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-27

Review 8.  A review of the efficacy and safety of oral antidiabetic drugs.

Authors:  Stephanie Aleskow Stein; Elizabeth Mary Lamos; Stephen N Davis
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.250

Review 9.  [Future targets in the treatment of type 2 diabetes].

Authors:  Harald Stingl; Michael Roden
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Economic model of first-line drug strategies to achieve recommended glycaemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Joe W Ramsdell; Seth N Braunstein; Jennifer M Stephens; Christopher F Bell; Marc F Botteman; Scott T Devine
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.