Literature DB >> 10368201

A circumcision service for religious reasons.

T Shah1, J Raistrick, I Taylor, M Young, D Menebhi, R Stevens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the results of a pioneering service introduced under National Health Service (NHS) cover, providing circumcision on religious grounds. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The service was offered to all male babies aged 6-14 weeks. Circumcision was carried out using the Plastibell technique under 1% lignocaine ring block/penile block anaesthesia. Between July 1996 and August 1998, 168 circumcisions were performed and assessed postoperatively by telephone enquiry, visiting at home by the nurse and review at the hospital if and when required.
RESULTS: Of the 168 babies, 31 required some follow-up care. In six babies the separated ring tracked back onto the shaft of the penis and had to be removed using a ring-cutter. Ten babies were referred for incomplete separation of the Plastibell ring; only two required removal, the rest of the rings detaching spontaneously within a few days. Two babies were reviewed for early separation of the ring and seven were reviewed for bleeding within 24 h of the operation. Two of these were immediately after circumcision, when the bleeding was seen to be from the torn frenulum. They were converted to a more formal circumcision without the Plastibell under the same anaesthesia. Surveillance with no intervention was required in the others, except one who needed a compression dressing. One baby had apyrexia, requiring antibiotics. Four babies had suspected wound infection but none was clinically significant. One parent remained dissatisfied and complained about the inadequate removal of the foreskin.
CONCLUSION: The aim of the service was to provide safe circumcision requested on religious grounds. The technique was simple and easily learned by nurses. Parents have generally been very satisfied and the complication rate was acceptable, with most problems occurring early in the series, suggesting an improvement with experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10368201     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00000.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  9 in total

1.  A unique service in UK delivering Plastibell circumcision: review of 9-year results.

Authors:  Victor Palit; David K Menebhi; Ian Taylor; Margaret Young; Yasser Elmasry; Tariq Shah
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Plastibell Circumcision: How Safe is it?: Experience at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital.

Authors:  Mohammed S Al-Marhoon; Said M Jaboub
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2006-06

3.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).

Authors:  Sumit Dave; Kourosh Afshar; Luis H Braga; Peter Anderson
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Osama A Bawazir
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2019-03-21

5.  Adult male circumcision with a circular stapler versus conventional circumcision: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  X D Jin; J J Lu; W H Liu; J Zhou; R K Yu; B Yu; X J Zhang; B H Shen
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.590

6.  Implementation of an infant male circumcision programme, Pakistan.

Authors:  Shazia Moosa; Ammar Ali Muhammad; Sohail Dogar; Sundus Iftikhar; Walter Johnson; Asad Latif; Lubna Samad
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Plastibell circumcision supported by a calcium-alginate fibre dressing to reduce bleeding.

Authors:  Ravisankar G Pillai; Ziad Al Naieb
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2015-05-19

8.  Acquired phimosis after plastibell circumcision: a preventable consequence.

Authors:  E A Kidger; N Haider; A Qazi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Plastibell Device Circumcision versus Bone Cutter Technique in terms of Operative Outcomes and Parent's Satisfaction.

Authors:  Tahir Mehmood; Hammad Azam; Muhammad Tariq; Zafar Iqbal; Hassan Mehmood; Syed Asif Hussain Shah
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.