Literature DB >> 10367833

Impact of drug therapy on benign prostatic hyperplasia-specific quality of life.

P R Rhodes1, R H Krogh, R C Bruskewitz.   

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) is an important issue when assessing medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). There are many QOL questionnaires available, and disease-specific questionnaires are being developed. Currently, most patients undergoing treatment for BPH receive alpha-blockers or finasteride. To determine which QOL measures are being used, we did a Medline search covering the past 10 years and found 11 studies in which BPH-QOL was investigated. The wide variety of questionnaires used made comparison between drug studies difficult. When comparing studies that used at least one similar questionnaire to that of another drug study, we found alpha-blocker treatment excelled over finasteride in improving BPH-QOL in the areas of earlier response, larger decreases in mean changes, and reduced sexual side effects. QOL assessment should be a routine part of BPH treatment, and more standardized and validated measures should be used to allow for comparative, meaningful analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10367833     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00041-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

Review 1.  Quality-of-life assessment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: effects of various interventions.

Authors:  J E Batista-Miranda; M D Diez; P A Bertrán; H Villavicencio
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Quality of life and sexual function in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Reginald C Bruskewitz
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

3.  Validity of the "bother score" in the evaluation and treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Michael P O'leary
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Changing therapeutic regimens in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clinical and economic considerations.

Authors:  H J Stoevelaar; J McDonnell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Hormonal treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: pros and cons.

Authors:  G J Wise; E O Md
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.862

6.  Outcomes and quality of life issues in the pharmacological management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Authors:  Angelo J Cambio; Christopher P Evans
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.423

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.