Literature DB >> 10367032

Prophylactic use of alfacalcidol in corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

J Y Reginster1, D Kuntz, W Verdickt, M Wouters, L Guillevin, C J Menkès, K Nielsen.   

Abstract

One hundred and forty-five patients suffering from diseases requiring long-term treatment with high doses of corticosteroids (30 mg/day or greater of prednisolone) were recruited to the study. Patients had to be steroid naive on entry to the study (not more than 15 days of treatment with a corticosteroid within the previous 24 months). Patients were randomized to receive either 1 microgram/day alfacalcidol or placebo capsules for 12 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was assessed by dual-photon absorptiometry on entry and after 3, 6 and 12 months' treatment. Safety was monitored by the recording of all adverse events reported by patients and the regular screening of blood samples for hematology and serum biochemistry. Of the 145 patients, 74 were randomized to alfacalcidol and 71 to placebo. The treatment groups were well matched at baseline with no significant differences in demographic, clinical or biochemical parameters. The mean equivalent dose of prednisolone at baseline was 46.6 mg/day and 46.3 mg/day for the alfacalcidol and placebo group respectively. From the 145 patients randomized to treatment, 71 (38 who received alfacalcidol and 33 who received placebo) provided BMD data both at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months. The percentage change in BMD after 6 months' treatment was -2.11% in the alfacalcidol group and -4.00% in the placebo group (p = 0.39). After 12 months the percentage change in BMD was +0.39% (CI: -4.28 to 4.81) in the alfacalcidol group and -5.67% (CI: -8.13 to -3.21) in the placebo group, this difference (6.06%, CI: 0.88 to 11.24) being statistically significant (p = 0.02). An intention to treat analysis also showed a significant difference between the two treatment groups in alfacalcidol's favor (3.81%, p = 0.01; CI: 0.92 to 6.70). There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in the corticosteroid dose at any time point during the study. Serum calcium was measured throughout and there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups at any visit. This study suggests that alfacalcidol can prevent corticosteroid-induced bone loss from the lumbar spine. Long-term use of alfacalcidol was not associated with any significant adverse effects in this diverse group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10367032     DOI: 10.1007/s001980050118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  27 in total

Review 1.  Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  P Boulos; G Ioannidis; J D Adachi
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Analysis of bone metabolism during early stage and clinical benefits of early intervention with alendronate in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases treated with high-dose glucocorticoid: Early DIagnosis and Treatment of OsteopoRosis in Japan (EDITOR-J) study.

Authors:  Yoshiya Tanaka; Hiroko Mori; Takatoshi Aoki; Tatsuya Atsumi; Yutaka Kawahito; Hisanori Nakayama; Shigeto Tohma; Yuji Yamanishi; Hitoshi Hasegawa; Kazuhide Tanimura; Nobuo Negoro; Yukitaka Ueki; Atsushi Kawakami; Katsumi Eguchi; Kazuyoshi Saito; Yosuke Okada
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  [Relative value of plain vitamin D and of biologically active vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis].

Authors:  S Scharla
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Questions on the superiority of alfacalcidol over plain vitamin D in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  Johann D Ringe
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  [Is therapy with calcium and vitamin D adequate in glucocorticoid induced and inflammation related osteoporosis?].

Authors:  D Ringe
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 6.  The clinical use of vitamin D metabolites and their potential developments: a position statement from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF).

Authors:  Luisella Cianferotti; Claudio Cricelli; John A Kanis; Ranuccio Nuti; Jean-Y Reginster; Johann D Ringe; Rene Rizzoli; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: treatment update and review.

Authors:  Lisa-Ann Fraser; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.346

8.  Guidelines on the management and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis of the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research: 2014 update.

Authors:  Yasuo Suzuki; Hajime Nawata; Satoshi Soen; Saeko Fujiwara; Hisanori Nakayama; Ikuko Tanaka; Keiichi Ozono; Akira Sagawa; Ryoichi Takayanagi; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Takami Miki; Naomi Masunari; Yoshiya Tanaka
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Superiority of alfacalcidol over plain vitamin D in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  J D Ringe; A Dorst; H Faber; E Schacht; V W Rahlfs
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: how best to avoid fractures.

Authors:  Mark S Cooper
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.