Literature DB >> 10366653

Oscillation and light induction of timeless mRNA in the mammalian circadian clock.

S A Tischkau1, J A Barnes, F J Lin, E M Myers, J W Barnes, E L Meyer-Bernstein, W J Hurst, P W Burgoon, D Chen, A Sehgal, M U Gillette.   

Abstract

Circadian rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster depend on a molecular feedback loop generated by oscillating products of the period (per) and timeless (tim) genes. In mammals, three per homologs are cyclically expressed in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), site of the circadian clock, and two of these, mPer1 and mPer2, are induced in response to light. Although this light response distinguishes the mammalian clock from its Drosophila counterpart, overall regulation, including homologous transcriptional activators, appears to be similar. Thus, the basic mechanisms used to generate circadian timing have been conserved. However, contrary to expectations, the recently isolated mammalian tim homolog was reported not to cycle. In this study, we examined mRNA levels of the same tim homolog using a different probe. We observed a significant (approximately threefold) diurnal variation in mTim expression within mouse SCN using two independent methods. Peak levels were evident at the day-to-night transition in light-entrained animals, and the oscillation persisted on the second day in constant conditions. Furthermore, light pulses known to induce phase delays caused significant elevation in mTim mRNA. In contrast, phase-advancing light pulses did not affect mTim levels. The mTim expression profile and the response to nocturnal light are similar to mPer2 and are delayed compared with mPer1. We conclude that temporal ordering of mTim and mPer2 parallels that of their fly homologs. We predict that mTIM may be the preferred functional partner for mPER2 and that expression of mTim and mPer2 may, in fact, be driven by mPER1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10366653      PMCID: PMC6782684     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  10 in total

1.  Differential cAMP gating of glutamatergic signaling regulates long-term state changes in the suprachiasmatic circadian clock.

Authors:  S A Tischkau; E A Gallman; G F Buchanan; M U Gillette
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  TIMELESS mutation alters phase responsiveness and causes advanced sleep phase.

Authors:  Philip Kurien; Pei-Ken Hsu; Jacy Leon; David Wu; Thomas McMahon; Guangsen Shi; Ying Xu; Anna Lipzen; Len A Pennacchio; Christopher R Jones; Ying-Hui Fu; Louis J Ptáček
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Antimicrobial capacity of the freshwater planarians against S. aureus is under the control of Timeless.

Authors:  Landry Laure Tsoumtsa; Cedric Torre; Virginie Trouplin; Benjamin Coiffard; Gregory Gimenez; Jean-Louis Mege; Eric Ghigo
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.882

Review 4.  Consequences of Circadian Disruption on Neurologic Health.

Authors:  Aleksandar Videnovic; Phyllis C Zee
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2015-09-26

5.  Individual Src-family tyrosine kinases direct the degradation or protection of the clock protein Timeless via differential ubiquitylation.

Authors:  Linda P O'Reilly; Xiong Zhang; Thomas E Smithgall
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.315

6.  Positional syntenic cloning and functional characterization of the mammalian circadian mutation tau.

Authors:  P L Lowrey; K Shimomura; M P Antoch; S Yamazaki; P D Zemenides; M R Ralph; M Menaker; J S Takahashi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-04-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  ERK/MAPK is essential for endogenous neuroprotection in SCN2.2 cells.

Authors:  Sumedha W Karmarkar; Kathleen M Bottum; Stacey L Krager; Shelley A Tischkau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Timeless in animal circadian clocks and beyond.

Authors:  Yao D Cai; Joanna C Chiu
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.622

Review 9.  Influences of the circadian clock on neuronal susceptibility to excitotoxicity.

Authors:  Sumedha W Karmarkar; Shelley A Tischkau
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 10.  Mammalian circadian biology: elucidating genome-wide levels of temporal organization.

Authors:  Phillip L Lowrey; Joseph S Takahashi
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.929

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.