Literature DB >> 10365496

Treatment modalities in a dental fear clinic and the relation with general psychopathology and oral health variables.

I H Aartman1, A de Jongh, P C Makkes, J Hoogstraten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences among highly anxious dental patients assigned to different treatment modes (i.e. behavioural management (BM), nitrous oxide sedation (NOS), intravenous sedation (IVS). Patients were compared with regard to psychological and dental variables before treatment (e.g. number of decayed teeth), and dental variables after treatment (e.g. number of fillings made).
DESIGN: Dentists experienced in the treatment of highly anxious patients allocated patients to a treatment mode based upon their clinical judgement.
SETTING: Centre for Special Dental Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
SUBJECTS: 211 patients from this dental fear clinic. MEASURES: General psychopathology, as measured by the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90), and dental anxiety (DAS, S-DAI, 10-point scale) were measured prior to treatment. From the panoramic radiograph the following pre-treatment dental variables were assessed: number of teeth, number of decayed teeth, number of retained roots, and number of root-filled teeth. After treatment, number of fillings, extractions, endodontically treated elements, number of visits, and treatment duration, were determined from the patients' records.
RESULTS: Of the 144 patients who received dental treatment at the clinic, 46.5% was treated using a BM approach, 27.8% with NOS, 22.9% with IVS, and 2.8% under GA. No differences among the treatment groups were found with regard to SCL-90 and dental anxiety. The results showed that patients in the IVS group had statistically significant more decayed teeth than patients in the BM group. Furthermore, more fillings were made in the IVS group than in the BM group.
CONCLUSION: Since it appeared possible to treat a large proportion of patients by BM alone, training dentists in the application of psychological methods for the treatment of anxious patients should be stimulated. In addition, future research should seek for variables that, besides oral health, are better able to discriminate between groups of highly anxious patients than measures of dental anxiety and psychopathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10365496     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  6 in total

1.  Reporting of dental status from full-arch radiographs: Descriptive analysis and methodological aspects.

Authors:  Fabian Huettig; Detlef Axmann
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 2.  The use of anaesthetic agents to provide anxiolysis and sedation in dentistry and oral surgery.

Authors:  Michael O'Halloran
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2013-12-31

3.  Comparison of the effects of cognitive behavioural therapy and inhalation sedation on child dental anxiety.

Authors:  F Kebriaee; A Sarraf Shirazi; K Fani; F Moharreri; A Soltanifar; Y Khaksar; F Mazhari
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-12-19

Review 4.  Efficacy of Hypnosis on Dental Anxiety and Phobia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Thomas Gerhard Wolf; Sina Schläppi; Carla Irene Benz; Guglielmo Campus
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 5.  Patient-centered endodontic outcomes: a narrative review.

Authors:  Reza Hamedy; Bita Shakiba; Sara Fayazi; Jacklyn G Pak; Shane N White
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-10-07

6.  Pain and Avoidance during and after Endodontic Therapy: The Role of Pain Anticipation and Self-Efficacy.

Authors:  Noelia Santos-Puerta; Cecilia Peñacoba-Puente
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.