Literature DB >> 10363346

Attention for action: coordinating bimanual reach-to-grasp movements.

G M Jackson1, S R Jackson, A Kritikos.   

Abstract

Theories of attention have frequently pointed to the finding that there is a significant performance decrement ('cost') to responding to two different objects concurrently. However, much of the research aimed at investigating how attention is 'divided' in such circumstances has adopted response time (RT) as the measure of interest. In this paper we investigate how attention is 'divided' during the execution of concurrent motor responses, by studying bimanual reach-to-grasp movements directed towards two separate target objects. Furthermore, a key aspect of our study is that each hand is required to perform either the same action (congruent reaches) or a different action (incongruent reaches). Thus in Expt 1 we manipulated the movement amplitude of each hand, while in Expt 2 we manipulated object size. The results of this study suggest that while there is an overall cost associated with carrying out two movements simultaneously, kinematic measures are unaffected by whether the actions required of each hand are the same (congruent) or different (incongruent). The problem of executing incongruent bimanual movements appears to be solved by synchronizing each limb to a common movement duration, while movement velocity and grip aperture are independently scaled. These findings are discussed in relation to theories developed to explain the coordination of the reach-and-grasp phases of unimanual prehension, and in the context of recent theories of attention for action.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10363346     DOI: 10.1348/000712699161396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  25 in total

1.  A cross-modal interference effect in grasping objects.

Authors:  Sandhiran Patchay; Umberto Castiello; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

2.  Bimanual coordination affects motor task switching.

Authors:  Brandon J Bernardin; Andrea H Mason
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Eye-hand coordination of symmetric bimanual reaching tasks: temporal aspects.

Authors:  Divya Srinivasan; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual feedback reduces bimanual coupling of movement amplitudes, but not of directions.

Authors:  Simone Cardoso de Oliveira; Sébastien Barthélémy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Coordination and concurrency in bimanual rotation tasks when moving away from and toward the body.

Authors:  A H Mason; P J Bryden
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The coordination patterns observed when two hands reach-to-grasp separate objects.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Bingham; Kirstie Hughes; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Left visual field preference for a bimanual grasping task with ecologically valid object sizes.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The order of gaze shifts affects spatial and temporal aspects of discrete bimanual pointing movements.

Authors:  Masahiro Kokubu; Soichi Ando; Shingo Oda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A right hemisphere dominance for bimanual grasps.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Bimanual coordination in children: manipulation of object size.

Authors:  Andrea H Mason; Jennifer L Bruyn; Jo-Anne C Lazarus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.