Literature DB >> 10363239

[Validation of the Spanish version of the Liebowitz social anxiety scale, social anxiety and distress scale and Sheehan disability inventory for the evaluation of social phobia].

J Bobes1, X Badía, A Luque, M García, M P González, R Dal-Ré.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social phobia is an anxiety disorder of increasing interest in clinical psychiatric practice and research. The questionnaires most widely used in the psychometric evaluation of these patients are: Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS), Social Anxiety and Distress Scale (SADS) and Sheehan Disability Inventory (SDI). The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity and reproducibility of the Spanish versions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Convergent validity was analysed by correlating patients' scores on the LSAS, SADS and SDI with scores on the Global Activity Evaluation Scale (GAES), the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EuroQol. Validity of the internal structure was examined by analysing the correlations between the different sub-escales of the questionnaires. Internal consistency was analysed using Cronbach's alpha and Kuder-Richardson coefficients. Discriminative capability was analysed by comparing LSAS, SADS and SDI scores of patients with social phobia with scores from healthy subjects, and with that obtained on the HAM-A and the EuroQol VAS. Reproducibility was analysed by re-testing patients after 15 days.
RESULTS: 57 patients and 57 healthy subjects were recruited in 4 psychiatric centres. The three questionnaires showed an adequate convergent validity with the GAES, the HAM-A and the EuroQol VAS (r = -0.24-0.40 and r = 0.29-0.52). The LSAS and SDI questionnaires showed a homogenous internal structure in terms of correlation between sub-scales (r = -0.61-0.93 for LSAS, and r = -0.04-0.61 for SDI). All the sub-scales of the questionnaires showed an adequate internal consistency (with coefficients between 0.72 and 0.88). The questionnaires discriminated between groups of patients with different levels of symptom severity and self-perceived overall health. They also discriminated between patients with social phobia and healthy subjects (area under the Receiver's Operating Characteristics curves = 0.95-0.99). All sub-scales from the questionnaires showed adequate reproducibility (with intraclass correlation coefficients between 0.63 and 0.88).
CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish versions of the LSAS, SADS and SDI questionnaires have shown adequate validity and reproducibility for use in clinical research and the clinical assessment of patients with social phobia in Spain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10363239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)        ISSN: 0025-7753            Impact factor:   1.725


  16 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of an innovative self-report measure: The Social Anxiety Questionnaire for adults.

Authors:  Vicente E Caballo; Benito Arias; Isabel C Salazar; María Jesús Irurtia; Stefan G Hofmann
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-03-16

2.  Impact of mental disorders and chronic physical conditions in health-related quality of life among primary care patients: results from an epidemiological study.

Authors:  Alejandra Pinto-Meza; Anna Fernández; Miquel Angel Fullana; Josep Maria Haro; Diego Palao; Juan Vicente Luciano; Antoni Serrano-Blanco
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Issues in the assessment of social phobia: a review.

Authors:  Andrea M Letamendi; Denise A Chavira; Murray B Stein
Journal:  Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 0.481

4.  Predictors of remission in depression to individual and combined treatments (PReDICT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Elisabeth B Binder; Joseph F Cubells; Mark M Goodman; Mary E Kelley; Becky Kinkead; Michael Kutner; Charles B Nemeroff; D Jeffrey Newport; Michael J Owens; Thaddeus W W Pace; James C Ritchie; Vivianne Aponte Rivera; Drew Westen; W Edward Craighead; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S): preliminary results.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Eirini Lekka; Evangelia Kouidi; Ioanna Chouvarda; Asterios Deligiannis; Nickolaos Maglaveras
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Social anxiety disorder in genuine halitosis patients.

Authors:  Takashi Zaitsu; Masayuki Ueno; Kayoko Shinada; Fredrick A Wright; Yoko Kawaguchi
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Can the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale - self-report version be used to differentiate clinical and non-clinical SAD groups among Brazilians?

Authors:  Larissa F Santos; Sonia R Loureiro; José A S Crippa; Flávia L Osório
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Integrated treatment of first episode psychosis with online training (e-learning): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sara Barbeito; Patricia Vega; Sonia Ruiz de Azua; Vicent Balanza-Martinez; Francesc Colom; Esther Lorente; Ana Luengo; Ester Cerrillo; José Manuel Crespo; Ana González Pinto
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Social anxiety disorder in Saudi adolescent boys: Prevalence, subtypes, and parenting style as a risk factor.

Authors:  Jaafar Y Ghazwani; Shamsun N Khalil; Razia A Ahmed
Journal:  J Family Community Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Apr

10.  Psychometric validation study of the liebowitz social anxiety scale - self-reported version for Brazilian Portuguese.

Authors:  Larissa Forni dos Santos; Sonia Regina Loureiro; José Alexandre de Souza Crippa; Flávia de Lima Osório
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.