Literature DB >> 10362343

Cisplatin ototoxicity: the importance of baseline audiometry.

J L Nagy1, D J Adelstein, C W Newman, L A Rybicki, T W Rice, P Lavertu.   

Abstract

The role and optimal use of audiometry in monitoring for cisplatin ototoxicity are incompletely defined. Audiograms were obtained from 217 patients before treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy for cancers of the esophagus, lung, or head and neck. Posttreatment audiometry then was conducted in 53 of these patients. Chemotherapy consisted of two (87%) or three (13%) courses of cisplatin at a dose of 20 mg/m2/day given as a continuous intravenous infusion over 4 days. Simultaneous 5-fluorouracil or paclitaxel also was given, and 38% received concurrent radiation therapy to the head and neck. Air-conduction thresholds for each ear were obtained at 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, and 8000 Hz. Three three-frequency pure-tone averages (PTA) also were calculated. Framingham gender-specific, age-adjusted norms were used, beginning at age 60 to correct for presbycusis, and the upper limit of normal was calculated as the greater of the Framingham mean plus twice the standard error, or 25 dB. Hearing abnormality was defined as a threshold >10 dB above the norm for any PTA, or >20 dB above the norm for any individual frequency. Hearing loss was defined as an elevation over baseline threshold of >10 dB for any PTA or >20 dB for any individual frequency. Of the 217 patients who underwent baseline testing, 57 (26%) were found to have hearing abnormality in excess of the expected presbycusis. Post-cisplatin audiograms demonstrated hearing loss in 19 of the 53 retested patients (36%) when compared with their own baseline. As determined by tympanometry, none of these subjects had a conductive component to their hearing loss. These observations were independent of the duration of follow-up after treatment and of the total dose of cisplatin administered. The authors conclude that significant preexisting hearing abnormality is common in this patient population and that, even after low-dose cisplatin administration, additional hearing loss occurs frequently. Baseline testing is mandatory if follow-up studies are to be adequately interpreted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10362343     DOI: 10.1097/00000421-199906000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  15 in total

1.  Cisplatin ototoxicity blocks sensory regeneration in the avian inner ear.

Authors:  Eric L Slattery; Mark E Warchol
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of ozone (O3) therapy on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in rats.

Authors:  Hasan Emre Koçak; Ümit Taşkın; Salih Aydın; Mehmet Faruk Oktay; Serdar Altınay; Duygu Sultan Çelik; Kadir Yücebaş; Bengül Altaş
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Reduction of cisplatin ototoxicity in rats by oral administration of pomegranate extract.

Authors:  Zahide Mine Yazici; Aysenur Meric; Ahmet Midi; Yasar Volkan Arınc; Volkan Kahya; Gunter Hafız
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Ototoxicity of cisplatin plus standard radiation therapy vs. accelerated radiation therapy in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Nicole E Marshall; Karla V Ballman; John C Michalak; Paula J Schomberg; Gary V Burton; Howard M Sandler; Terrence L Cascino; Kurt A Jaeckle; Jan C Buckner
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  A Review of Cisplatin-Associated Ototoxicity.

Authors:  Jessica Paken; Cyril D Govender; Mershen Pillay; Vikash Sewram
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2019-04-26

6.  Evaluation of audiometric threshold shift criteria for ototoxicity monitoring.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kenneth E James; Jane S Gordon; Kelly M Reavis; David S Phillips; Gene W Bratt; Stephen A Fausti
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 7.  Auditory late effects of childhood cancer therapy: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Satkiran Grewal; Thomas Merchant; Renee Reymond; Maryrose McInerney; Cathy Hodge; Patricia Shearer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  The anticancer drug cisplatin induces an intrinsic apoptotic pathway inside the inner ear.

Authors:  J R García-Berrocal; J Nevado; R Ramírez-Camacho; R Sanz; J A González-García; C Sánchez-Rodríguez; B Cantos; P España; J M Verdaguer; A Trinidad Cabezas
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Cisplatin exposure damages resident stem cells of the mammalian inner ear.

Authors:  Eric L Slattery; Kazuo Oshima; Stefan Heller; Mark E Warchol
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.780

10.  Feasibility and first results of a prospective cohort study to investigate cisplatin-associated ototoxicity amongst cancer patients in South Africa.

Authors:  Jessica Paken; Cyril D Govender; Mershen Pillay; Birhanu T Ayele; Vikash Sewram
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.