OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test who are treated with an implantable defibrillator. BACKGROUND: Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and unexplained syncope may be at high risk for sudden cardiac death, and they are sometimes treated with an implantable defibrillator. METHODS: This study prospectively determined the outcome of 14 consecutive patients who had a nonischemic cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test and who underwent defibrillator implantation (Syncope Group). Nineteen consecutive patients with a nonischemic cardiomyopathy and a cardiac arrest who were treated with a defibrillator (Arrest Group) served as a control group. RESULTS: Seven of 14 patients (50%) in the Syncope Group received appropriate shocks for ventricular arrhythmias during a mean follow-up of 24+/-13 months, compared with 8 of 19 patients (42%) in the Arrest Group during a mean follow-up of 45+/-40 months (p = 0.1). The mean duration from device implantation until the first appropriate shock was 32+/-7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18 to 45 months) in the Syncope Group compared to 72+/-12 months (95% CI, 48 to 96 months) in the Arrest Group (p = 0.1). Among patients who received appropriate shocks, the mean time from defibrillator implantation to the first appropriate shock was 10+/-14 months in the Syncope Group, compared with 48+/-47 months in the Arrest Group (p = 0.06). Recurrent syncope was always associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of appropriate defibrillator shocks and the association of recurrent syncope with ventricular arrhythmias support the treatment of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test with an implantable defibrillator.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test who are treated with an implantable defibrillator. BACKGROUND:Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and unexplained syncope may be at high risk for sudden cardiac death, and they are sometimes treated with an implantable defibrillator. METHODS: This study prospectively determined the outcome of 14 consecutive patients who had a nonischemic cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test and who underwent defibrillator implantation (Syncope Group). Nineteen consecutive patients with a nonischemic cardiomyopathy and a cardiac arrest who were treated with a defibrillator (Arrest Group) served as a control group. RESULTS: Seven of 14 patients (50%) in the Syncope Group received appropriate shocks for ventricular arrhythmias during a mean follow-up of 24+/-13 months, compared with 8 of 19 patients (42%) in the Arrest Group during a mean follow-up of 45+/-40 months (p = 0.1). The mean duration from device implantation until the first appropriate shock was 32+/-7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18 to 45 months) in the Syncope Group compared to 72+/-12 months (95% CI, 48 to 96 months) in the Arrest Group (p = 0.1). Among patients who received appropriate shocks, the mean time from defibrillator implantation to the first appropriate shock was 10+/-14 months in the Syncope Group, compared with 48+/-47 months in the Arrest Group (p = 0.06). Recurrent syncope was always associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of appropriate defibrillator shocks and the association of recurrent syncope with ventricular arrhythmias support the treatment of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test with an implantable defibrillator.
Authors: Juan Villafane; Jacob R Miller; Julie Glickstein; Jonathan N Johnson; Jonathan Wagner; Chris S Snyder; Tatiana Filina; Scott L Pomeroy; S Kristen Sexson-Tejtel; Caitlin Haxel; Jason Gottlieb; Pirooz Eghtesady; Devyani Chowdhury Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2021-01-02 Impact factor: 1.655