Literature DB >> 10362177

Fetal pulse oximetry: duration of desaturation and intrapartum outcome.

S L Bloom1, R G Swindle, D D McIntire, K J Leveno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze labor outcomes in relation to masked fetal arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation values above or below 30%.
METHODS: Consenting gravidas with uncomplicated pregnancies at or beyond 36 weeks' gestation underwent continuous fetal pulse oximetry. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between two groups: women with fetuses with at least one epoch of arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation below 30% (10 seconds or longer) and women with fetuses without such an episode. We also attempted to ascertain whether duration of saturation below 30% correlated with fetal compromise.
RESULTS: We measured arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation in 129 fetuses, 69 (53%) of whom had at least one epoch of saturation below 30%. There were no statistically significant differences in labor and delivery outcomes between the high-saturation and low-saturation groups (eg, cesarean delivery: 13 versus 9%, P = .41; umbilical artery [UA] pH less than 7.20: 10 versus 9%, P > .999). However, as duration of fetal arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation below 30% increased from 10 seconds to longer than 9 consecutive minutes, the incidence of fetal compromise (considered present when at least one of the following criteria was met: cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate pattern, UA pH less than 7.20, admission to the special care nursery, or 5-minute Apgar score not more than 3) increased significantly (P = .002). The threshold duration of fetal arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation below 30% associated with increased fetal compromise was 2 minutes.
CONCLUSION: Transient fetal arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation values below 30% are common during normal labor and did not predict fetal compromise. Fetal arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation values less than 30% for 2 minutes or longer might be associated with fetal compromise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10362177     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00565-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  2 in total

Review 1.  Intrapartum Electronic Foetal Monitoring : Does it Lead or Mislead?

Authors:  Shakti Vardhan; T K Bhattacharyya; S K Kathpalia; Sps Kochar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 2.  What we have learned about intrapartum fetal monitoring trials in the MFMU Network.

Authors:  Steven L Bloom; Michael Belfort; George Saade
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.300

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.