BACKGROUND: The etiology of breast cancer is not fully understood. Environmental and occupational exposures may contribute to breast cancer risk. METHODS: We linked 324 job titles from the 1970 census of 892,591 Finnish women with incidence of breast cancer (23,638 cases) during 1971-1995. We converted job titles to 31 chemical and two ergonomic agents through a measurement-based, period-specific, national job-exposure matrix. Poisson regression models were fit to the data, with adjustment for birth cohort, follow-up period, socioeconomic status, mean number of children, mean age at first delivery, and turnover rate. RESULTS: For premenopausal breast cancer, medium/high level of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation was associated with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-2.5; trend P = 0.03). For postmenopausal breast cancer, we found on SIR of 1.2 (1.1-1.3) for low level and 1.4 (1.1-1.8) for medium/high level of ionizing radiation (trend P = 0.001); and an SIR 1.3 (1.1-1.7) for medium/high levels of both asbestos and man-made vitreous fibers. Aromatic hydrocarbon solvents showed a significant trend for a modest excess of postmenopausal breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that occupational exposure to ionizing radiation may be associated with an increased risk of female breast cancer. High-quality studies on environmental and occupational etiology of breast cancer are needed for further elucidation of risk factors.
BACKGROUND: The etiology of breast cancer is not fully understood. Environmental and occupational exposures may contribute to breast cancer risk. METHODS: We linked 324 job titles from the 1970 census of 892,591 Finnish women with incidence of breast cancer (23,638 cases) during 1971-1995. We converted job titles to 31 chemical and two ergonomic agents through a measurement-based, period-specific, national job-exposure matrix. Poisson regression models were fit to the data, with adjustment for birth cohort, follow-up period, socioeconomic status, mean number of children, mean age at first delivery, and turnover rate. RESULTS: For premenopausal breast cancer, medium/high level of occupational exposure to ionizing radiation was associated with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-2.5; trend P = 0.03). For postmenopausal breast cancer, we found on SIR of 1.2 (1.1-1.3) for low level and 1.4 (1.1-1.8) for medium/high level of ionizing radiation (trend P = 0.001); and an SIR 1.3 (1.1-1.7) for medium/high levels of both asbestos and man-made vitreous fibers. Aromatic hydrocarbon solvents showed a significant trend for a modest excess of postmenopausal breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that occupational exposure to ionizing radiation may be associated with an increased risk of female breast cancer. High-quality studies on environmental and occupational etiology of breast cancer are needed for further elucidation of risk factors.
Authors: Beata Peplonska; Patricia Stewart; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A Brinton; Jan Piotr Gromiec; Slawomir Brzeznicki; Xiaohong R Yang; Mark Sherman; Montserrat García-Closas; Aaron Blair Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2009-10-09 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Christine C Ekenga; Christine G Parks; Aimee A D'Aloisio; Lisa A DeRoo; Dale P Sandler Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jon Boyer; Monica Galizzi; Manuel Cifuentes; Angelo d'Errico; Rebecca Gore; Laura Punnett; Craig Slatin Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Ya-Yuan Hsu; Chyi-Huey Bai; Chung-Ching Wang; Wei-Liang Chen; Wei-Te Wu; Ching-Huang Lai Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Peggy Reynolds; Susan E Hurley; Robert B Gunier; Sauda Yerabati; Thu Quach; Andrew Hertz Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Imran Rafi; Susmita Chowdhury; Tom Chan; Ibrahim Jubber; Mohammad Tahir; Simon de Lusignan Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 2.497