Literature DB >> 10360868

Halothane presynaptically depresses synaptic transmission in wild-type Drosophila larvae but not in halothane-resistant (har) mutants.

K Nishikawa1, Y Kidokoro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General anesthetics produce important changes in neural function, but the relation between the many individual changes produced by anesthetics in neural components and the responsiveness of the whole organism is uncertain. An analysis of genetically altered animals that have modified responses to volatile anesthetics may help to allay this uncertainty.
METHODS: The authors evaluated the effect of halothane on synaptic transmission at the larval neuromuscular junction in wild-type (Ore-R) and halothane-resistant (har) mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. The body wall muscles, which are innervated by glutamatergic nerves, were voltage clamped at -60 mV using the patch-clamp technique in the whole cell configuration. Nerve-evoked excitatory junctional currents and miniature excitatory junctional currents were recorded. The effects of halothane on the amplitude of these currents were compared in Ore-R and two bar mutants derived from the Ore-R strain. The time course and frequency of miniature excitatory junctional currents also were analyzed in the presence of halothane.
RESULTS: In Ore-R, halothane (1.8%; 1.01 mM) significantly reduced the amplitude of nerve-evoked excitatory junctional currents (61.9+/-17% of control, mean +/- SD; n = 7), but not that of miniature excitatory junctional currents. Conversely, in two har mutants, halothane had no effect on the amplitude of either nerve-evoked excitatory junctional currents or miniature excitatory junctional currents. In Ore-R, the frequency of miniature excitatory junctional currents was decreased significantly in the presence of halothane (0.9-2.7%; 0.52-1.46 mM), whereas halothane did not change the frequency in two har mutants. The miniature excitatory junctional current decay time constant, thought to reflect the kinetic properties of junctional glutamate receptor channels, was not changed by halothane in either the Ore-R strain or the har mutants.
CONCLUSIONS: Halothane depresses synaptic transmission at the wild-type Drosophila neuromuscular junction, most likely by affecting presynaptic properties. The absence of an effect by halothane in the har mutants provides evidence that the depression of presynaptic function at the glutamate-mediated synapses is an important contributor to the way halothane alters the responsiveness of the whole animal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10360868     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  10 in total

1.  Membrane and synaptic actions of halothane on rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons and inhibitory interneurons.

Authors:  K Nishikawa; M B MacIver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Sodium channels and the synaptic mechanisms of inhaled anaesthetics.

Authors:  H C Hemmings
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Goalpha regulates volatile anesthetic action in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  B van Swinderen; L B Metz; L D Shebester; J E Mendel; P W Sternberg; C M Crowder
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  De novo mutations in NALCN cause a syndrome characterized by congenital contractures of the limbs and face, hypotonia, and developmental delay.

Authors:  Jessica X Chong; Margaret J McMillin; Kathryn M Shively; Anita E Beck; Colby T Marvin; Jose R Armenteros; Kati J Buckingham; Naomi T Nkinsi; Evan A Boyle; Margaret N Berry; Maureen Bocian; Nicola Foulds; Maria Luisa Giovannucci Uzielli; Chad Haldeman-Englert; Raoul C M Hennekam; Paige Kaplan; Antonie D Kline; Catherine L Mercer; Malgorzata J M Nowaczyk; Jolien S Klein Wassink-Ruiter; Elizabeth W McPherson; Regina A Moreno; Angela E Scheuerle; Vandana Shashi; Cathy A Stevens; John C Carey; Arnaud Monteil; Philippe Lory; Holly K Tabor; Joshua D Smith; Jay Shendure; Deborah A Nickerson; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A Caenorhabditis elegans pheromone antagonizes volatile anesthetic action through a go-coupled pathway.

Authors:  Bruno van Swinderen; Laura B Metz; Laynie D Shebester; C Michael Crowder
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Resistance to volatile anesthetics by mutations enhancing excitatory neurotransmitter release in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Ammar H Hawasli; Owais Saifee; Christine Liu; Michael L Nonet; C Michael Crowder
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) requires the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor for its action in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  P Nagele; L B Metz; C M Crowder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Behavioral and electrophysiological analysis of general anesthesia in 3 background strains of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Oressia Zalucki; Rebecca Day; Benjamin Kottler; Shanker Karunanithi; Bruno van Swinderen
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.160

9.  Isoflurane depresses glutamate release by reducing neuronal excitability at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction.

Authors:  David J Sandstrom
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  The sodium leak channel, NALCN, in health and disease.

Authors:  Maud Cochet-Bissuel; Philippe Lory; Arnaud Monteil
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 5.505

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.