BACKGROUND: Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) is commonly infused during cardiac surgery using empiric dosing schemes. The authors developed a pharmacokinetic model for EACA elimination in surgical patients, tested whether adjustments for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) would improve the model, and then used the model to develop an EACA dosing schedule that would yield nearly constant EACA blood concentrations. METHODS: Consenting patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery received one of two loading doses of EACA, 30 mg/kg (group I, n = 7) or 100 mg/kg (group II, n = 6) after CPB, or (group III) a 100 mg/kg loading dose before CPB and a 10 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) maintenance infusion continued for 4 h during and after CPB (n = 7). Two patients with renal failure received EACA in the manner of group III. Blood concentrations of EACA, measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, were subjected to mixed-effects pharmacokinetic modeling. RESULTS: The EACA concentration data were best fit by a model with two compartments and corrections for CPB. The elimination rate constant k10 fell from 0.011 before CPB to 0.0006 during CPB, returning to 0.011 after CPB. V1 increased 3.8 l with CPB and remained at that value thereafter. Cl1 varied from 0.08 l/min before CPB to 0.007 l/min during CPB and 0.13 l/min after CPB. Cl2 increased from 0.09 l/min before CPB to 0.14 l/min during and after CPB. Two patients with renal failure demonstrated markedly reduced clearance. Using their model, the authors predict that an EACA loading infusion of 50 mg/kg given over 20 min and a maintenance infusion of 25 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) would maintain a nearly constant target concentration of 260 microg/ml. CONCLUSIONS: EACA clearance declines and volume of distribution increases during CPB. The authors' model predicts that more stable perioperative EACA concentrations would be obtained with a smaller loading dose (50 mg/kg given over 20 min) and a more rapid maintenance infusion (25 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) than are typically employed.
BACKGROUND:Epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) is commonly infused during cardiac surgery using empiric dosing schemes. The authors developed a pharmacokinetic model for EACA elimination in surgical patients, tested whether adjustments for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) would improve the model, and then used the model to develop an EACA dosing schedule that would yield nearly constant EACA blood concentrations. METHODS: Consenting patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery received one of two loading doses of EACA, 30 mg/kg (group I, n = 7) or 100 mg/kg (group II, n = 6) after CPB, or (group III) a 100 mg/kg loading dose before CPB and a 10 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) maintenance infusion continued for 4 h during and after CPB (n = 7). Two patients with renal failure received EACA in the manner of group III. Blood concentrations of EACA, measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, were subjected to mixed-effects pharmacokinetic modeling. RESULTS: The EACA concentration data were best fit by a model with two compartments and corrections for CPB. The elimination rate constant k10 fell from 0.011 before CPB to 0.0006 during CPB, returning to 0.011 after CPB. V1 increased 3.8 l with CPB and remained at that value thereafter. Cl1 varied from 0.08 l/min before CPB to 0.007 l/min during CPB and 0.13 l/min after CPB. Cl2 increased from 0.09 l/min before CPB to 0.14 l/min during and after CPB. Two patients with renal failure demonstrated markedly reduced clearance. Using their model, the authors predict that an EACA loading infusion of 50 mg/kg given over 20 min and a maintenance infusion of 25 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) would maintain a nearly constant target concentration of 260 microg/ml. CONCLUSIONS:EACA clearance declines and volume of distribution increases during CPB. The authors' model predicts that more stable perioperative EACA concentrations would be obtained with a smaller loading dose (50 mg/kg given over 20 min) and a more rapid maintenance infusion (25 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1)) than are typically employed.
Authors: Michael P Eaton; George M Alfieris; Dawn M Sweeney; Ronald E Angona; Jill M Cholette; Charles Venuto; Brian Anderson Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: P A Stricker; M R Gastonguay; D Singh; J E Fiadjoe; E M Sussman; E Y Pruitt; T K Goebel; A F Zuppa Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Daryl L Reust; Scott T Reeves; James H Abernathy; Jennifer A Dixon; William F Gaillard; Rupak Mukherjee; Christine N Koval; Robert E Stroud; Francis G Spinale Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: P A Stricker; A F Zuppa; J E Fiadjoe; L G Maxwell; E M Sussman; E Y Pruitt; T K Goebel; M R Gastonguay; J A Taylor; S P Bartlett; M S Schreiner Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Nadia B Hensley; Megan P Kostibas; William W Yang; Todd C Crawford; Kaushik Mandal; Pranjal B Gupta; Steven M Frank; Charles H Brown Journal: Transfusion Date: 2017-10-08 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: J M Balaguer; C Yu; J G Byrne; S K Ball; M R Petracek; N J Brown; M Pretorius Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2012-12-24 Impact factor: 6.875