Literature DB >> 10360860

Effect of combined mouth closure and chin lift on upper airway dimensions during routine magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients sedated with propofol.

A Reber1, S G Wetzel, K Schnabel, G Bongartz, F J Frei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In pediatric patients, obstruction of the upper airway is a common problem during general anesthesia. Chin lift is a commonly used technique to improve upper airway patency. However, little is known about the mechanism underlying this technique.
METHODS: The authors studied the effect of the chin lift maneuver on airway dimensions in 10 spontaneously breathing children (aged 2-11 yr) sedated with propofol during routine magnetic resonance imaging. The minimal anteroposterior and corresponding transverse diameters of the pharynx were determined at the levels of the soft palate, dorsum of the tongue, and tip of the epiglottis before and during the chin lift maneuver. Additionally, cross-sectional areas were calculated at these sites, including tracheal areas 2 cm below the glottic level.
RESULTS: Minimal anteroposterior diameter of the pharynx increased significantly during chin lift at all three levels in all patients. The diameters of the soft palate, tongue, and epiglottis increased from 6.7+/-2.8 mm (SD) to 9.9+/-3.6 mm, from 9.6+/-3.6 mm to 16.5+/-3.1 mm, and from 4.6+/-2.5 mm to 13.1+/-2.8 mm, respectively. The corresponding transverse diameter of the pharynx also increased significantly at all three levels in all patients but without significant predominance. The diameters at the levels of the soft palate, tongue, and epiglottis increased from 15.8+/-5.1 mm to 22.8+/-4.5 mm, from 13.5+/-4.9 mm to 18.7+/-5.3 mm, and from 17.2+/-3.9 mm to 21.2+/-3.7 mm, respectively. Cross-sectional pharyngeal areas increased significantly at all levels (soft palate, from 0.88+/-0.58 cm2 to 1.79+/-0.82 cm2; tongue, from 1.15+/-0.45 cm2 to 2.99+/-1.30 cm2; epiglottis, from 1.17+/-0.70 cm2 to 3.04+/-0.99 cm2), including the subglottic level (from 0.44+/-0.15 cm2 to 0.50+/-0.14 cm2).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that all children had a preserved upper airway at all measured sites during propofol sedation. Chin lift caused a widening of the entire pharyngeal airway that was most pronounced between the tip of the epiglottis and the posterior pharyngeal wall. In pediatric patients, chin lift may be used as a standard procedure during propofol sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10360860     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Management of the upper airway in spontaneously breathing children. A challenge for the anaesthetist].

Authors:  B S von Ungern-Sternberg; T O Erb; F J Frei
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Airway management in the spontaneously breathing child].

Authors:  A Reber
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  [Airway management in sedated patients].

Authors:  A Reber
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  Airway Management During Upper GI Endoscopic Procedures: State of the Art Review.

Authors:  Basavana Goudra; Preet Mohinder Singh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  A Remote-Controlled Airbag Device Can Improve Upper Airway Collapsibility by Producing Head Elevation With Jaw Closure in Normal Subjects Under Propofol Anesthesia.

Authors:  Satoru Ishizaka; Shunji Moromugi; Masato Kobayashi; Hiroki Kajihara; Kazuya Koga; Hirofumi Sugahara; Takakazu Ishimatsu; Shinji Kurata; Jason P Kirkness; Kumiko Oi; Takao Ayuse
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.316

6.  Propofol for pediatric radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jyotsna Punj; Sushma Bhatnagar; Abha Saxena; Seema Mishra; T R Kannan; Manas Panigrahi; Vipin Pandey
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies: propofol dosing and adverse events.

Authors:  Gregory A Hollman; Meredith M Schultz; Jens C Eickhoff; Devon K Christenson
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.624

8.  Contrast-Induced Vomiting in Pediatric Patients Under Propofol Sedation: A Case Series.

Authors:  Shane C Rainey; Nadia Shaikh; Keith A Hanson
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec

9.  Airway Dimensions in Children with Neurological Disabilities During Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Kamath Sriganesh; Jitender Saini; Kaushik Theerth; Sudhir Venkataramaiah
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-11-27

10.  Defining Optimal Head-Tilt Position of Resuscitation in Neonates and Young Infants Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Authors:  Utpal S Bhalala; Malvi Hemani; Meehir Shah; Barbara Kim; Brian Gu; Angelo Cruz; Priya Arunachalam; Elli Tian; Christine Yu; Joshua Punnoose; Steven Chen; Christopher Petrillo; Alisa Brown; Karina Munoz; Grant Kitchen; Taylor Lam; Thangamadhan Bosemani; Thierry A G M Huisman; Robert H Allen; Soumyadipta Acharya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.