Literature DB >> 10360657

The development of a structured rating schedule (the BAS) to assess skills in breaking bad news.

S J Miller1, T Hope, D C Talbot.   

Abstract

There has been considerable interest in how doctors break bad news, with calls from within the profession and from patients for doctors to improve their communication skills. In order to aid clinical training and assessment of the skills used in breaking bad news there is a need for a reliable, practical and valid, structured rating schedule. Such a rating schedule was compiled from agreed criteria in the literature. Video-taped recordings of simulated consultations breaking bad news were independently assessed by three raters using the schedule and compared to three experts who gave global ratings. The primary outcome measures were internal consistency of the schedule and level of agreement between raters. The internal consistency was high with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93. Agreement between raters using the schedule was moderate to good. The majority of the variation in scores was due to the differences in skills demonstrated in the interviews. The agreement between raters not using the schedule was poor. The BAS provides a simple to use, reliable, and consistent rating schedule for assessing skills used in breaking bad news. It could be a valuable aid to teaching this difficult task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10360657      PMCID: PMC2362267          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  26 in total

1.  Reliability of skin involvement measures in scleroderma. The UK Scleroderma Study Group.

Authors:  P Brennan; A Silman; C Black; R Bernstein; J Coppock; P Maddison; T Sheeran; C Stevens; F Wollheim
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1992-07

2.  Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.

Authors:  P Brennan; A Silman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-06-06

3.  Communicate with cancer patients: 1. Handling bad news and difficult questions.

Authors:  P Maguire; A Faulkner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-08

Review 4.  Coping theory and research: past, present, and future.

Authors:  R S Lazarus
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Giving sad and bad news.

Authors:  L Fallowfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Communicating with patients: surgeons' perceptions of their skills and need for training.

Authors:  A Girgis; R W Sanson-Fisher; W H McCarthy
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1997-11

7.  How well do faculty evaluate the interviewing skills of medical students?

Authors:  A Kalet; J A Earp; V Kowlowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Communicating the diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  L Sell; B Devlin; S J Bourke; N C Munro; P A Corris; G J Gibson
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.415

9.  How well do internal medicine faculty members evaluate the clinical skills of residents?

Authors:  G L Noel; J E Herbers; M P Caplow; G S Cooper; L N Pangaro; J Harvey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Consultation skills of young doctors: I--Benefits of feedback training in interviewing as students persist.

Authors:  P Maguire; S Fairbairn; C Fletcher
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-06-14
View more
  9 in total

1.  Social worker assessment of bad news delivery by emergency medicine residents: a novel direct-observation milestone assessment.

Authors:  Alice Ann Min; Karen Spear-Ellinwood; Melissa Berman; Peyton Nisson; Suzanne Michelle Rhodes
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  The influence of distress on knowledge transfer for men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Authors:  R B Hovey; K E S Cuthbertson; K A Birnie; J W Robinson; B C Thomas; H F Massfeller; J D Ruether; C Scott
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Information to cancer patients: a questionnaire survey in three different geographical areas in Italy.

Authors:  R Bracci; E Zanon; R Cellerino; R Gesuita; F Puglisi; G Aprile; V Barbieri; D Misuraca; S Venuta; F Carle; A Piga
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Cancer genetic counselor information needs for risk communication: a qualitative evaluation of interview transcripts.

Authors:  Casey Lynnette Overby; Wendy K Chung; George Hripcsak; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2013

5.  Counseling for personal care options at neonatal end of life: a quantitative and qualitative parent survey.

Authors:  Emily Shelkowitz; Sharon L Vessella; Patricia O'Reilly; Richard Tucker; Beatrice E Lechner
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Design and Validation of a Questionnaire on Communicating Bad News in Nursing: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Manuel González-Cabrera; Ana Raquel Ortega-Martínez; Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano; Antonio Hernández-Martínez; Laura Parra-Anguita; Antonio Frías-Osuna
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a communication skills training programme for hospital physicians by a specialized palliative care service: the 'Teach to Talk' programme.

Authors:  S Tanzi; L De Panfilis; M Costantini; G Artioli; S Alquati; S Di Leo
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Breaking bad news of cancer diagnosis - Perception of the cancer patients in a rural community in Malaysia.

Authors:  Mathew Gabriel Bain; Cheah Whye Lian; Chang Ching Thon
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2014-04

9.  Behavioral Patterns in Breaking Bad News Communication: An Ethnographic Study with Hematologists.

Authors:  Giovanna Artioli; Luca Ghirotto; Sara Alquati; Silvia Tanzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.