Literature DB >> 10360515

Early pregnancy screening for fetal aneuploidy with serum markers and nuchal translucency.

I M de Graaf1, E Pajkrt, C M Bilardo, N J Leschot, H S Cuckle, J M van Lith.   

Abstract

We determined the aneuploidy detection rate achievable by early pregnancy screening with pregnancy associated plasma protein (PAPP)-A, free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) and ultrasound nuchal translucency (NT) measurement. Women having prenatal diagnosis were scanned, and a blood sample was taken and stored. Stored samples were tested and a total of 37 were found to have Down syndrome, 8 to have Edwards syndrome and 255 were controls. Results were expressed in multiples of the gestation-specific median (MOM) value in the controls after regression and, for the serum markers, maternal weight adjustment. In Down syndrome the medians were for PAPP-A 0.63 MOM (95 per cent confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.87); free beta-hCG 1.88 MOM (1.33-2.66); and NT 2.34 MOM (1.70-3.22). Using these parameters the expected detection rate for a 5 per cent false-positive rate for different marker combinations were: 55.3 per cent for PAPP-A and free beta-hCG; 68.4 per cent for NT alone; and 84.6 per cent for PAPP-A, free beta-hCG and NT. The median values for Edwards syndrome were: 0.17 MOM for PAPP-A; 0.18 MOM for free beta-hCG; and 2.64 MOM for NT. Early pregnancy screening with the combined measurement of maternal serum PAPP-A and free beta-hCG and fetal nuchal translucency could achieve a high Down syndrome detection rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10360515     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199905)19:5<458::aid-pd569>3.0.co;2-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  8 in total

1.  Evidence based screening for Down's syndrome. We should be prepared to re-examine entrenched practices.

Authors:  S Raeburn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-04

2.  Effects of period of gestation and position of fetal neck on nuchal translucency measurement.

Authors:  Shailesh Kore; Aparna Hegde; Divya Kanavia; Pradnya Supe; Mansi Parikh; Y S Nandanwar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-04-16

Review 3.  Down's syndrome screening: a controversial test, with more controversy to come!

Authors:  T M Reynolds
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 5.  First and second trimester serum tests with and without first trimester ultrasound tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-15

Review 6.  Second trimester serum tests for Down's Syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Jonathan J Deeks; Boliang Guo; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 7.  First trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Yemisi Takwoingi; Boliang Guo; Mary Pennant; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30

Review 8.  Urine tests for Down's syndrome screening.

Authors:  S Kate Alldred; Boliang Guo; Yemisi Takwoingi; Mary Pennant; Susanna Wisniewski; Jonathan J Deeks; James P Neilson; Zarko Alfirevic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.