S Küpeli1, T Soygür, E Yilmaz, M Budak. 1. Department of Urology, Ankara University Medical Faculty, Ibni Sina Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Postoperative irritative symptoms and lack of tissue samples for histologic examination are the two main disadvantages of transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate. To decrease the postoperative irritative symptoms while minimizing intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and also to obtain tissue samples, we have combined the techniques of transurethral resection and vaporization, a procedure we have termed Vapor-cut, by using the Wolf Wing gold-plated electrode. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were enrolled in the study. Adverse events during the procedure, including serial changes in both serum hematocrit and sodium, and postoperative irritative symptoms were recorded after removal of the urethral catheter. Preoperative and postoperative symptom scores and maximum flow rates (Qmax) were obtained in each patient. The volume of the prostate was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using transrectal ultrasonography. RESULTS: During the procedure, there was minimal bleeding, and serum sodium and hematocrit levels were not changed significantly. The mean operative time was 49.3 minutes. The catheterization time and hospital stay were 48 and 60 hours, respectively. Only five patients (10%) reported transient and intermittent postoperative hematuria lasting for 1 week. After removal of the urethral catheter, four patients (8%) had irritative voiding symptoms. No patients experienced postoperative urinary retention or required subsequent catheterization. At 3-month follow-up, the improvement in the mean Qmax was 114%, and the decrease in the symptom score was 72%. The average reduction in the weight of the prostate was 55%. CONCLUSION: Vapor-cut of the prostate appears to be a safe, effective alternative to the standard loop resection and vaporization. It has the advantages of minimal blood loss, excellent operative visibility, decreased postoperative irritative symptoms, and availability of tissue samples with short catheterization and hospitalization times.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Postoperative irritative symptoms and lack of tissue samples for histologic examination are the two main disadvantages of transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate. To decrease the postoperative irritative symptoms while minimizing intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and also to obtain tissue samples, we have combined the techniques of transurethral resection and vaporization, a procedure we have termed Vapor-cut, by using the Wolf Wing gold-plated electrode. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were enrolled in the study. Adverse events during the procedure, including serial changes in both serum hematocrit and sodium, and postoperative irritative symptoms were recorded after removal of the urethral catheter. Preoperative and postoperative symptom scores and maximum flow rates (Qmax) were obtained in each patient. The volume of the prostate was measured preoperatively and postoperatively using transrectal ultrasonography. RESULTS: During the procedure, there was minimal bleeding, and serum sodium and hematocrit levels were not changed significantly. The mean operative time was 49.3 minutes. The catheterization time and hospital stay were 48 and 60 hours, respectively. Only five patients (10%) reported transient and intermittent postoperative hematuria lasting for 1 week. After removal of the urethral catheter, four patients (8%) had irritative voiding symptoms. No patients experienced postoperative urinary retention or required subsequent catheterization. At 3-month follow-up, the improvement in the mean Qmax was 114%, and the decrease in the symptom score was 72%. The average reduction in the weight of the prostate was 55%. CONCLUSION: Vapor-cut of the prostate appears to be a safe, effective alternative to the standard loop resection and vaporization. It has the advantages of minimal blood loss, excellent operative visibility, decreased postoperative irritative symptoms, and availability of tissue samples with short catheterization and hospitalization times.