Literature DB >> 10360296

Orbital blow-out fractures: correlation of preoperative computed tomography and postoperative ocular motility.

G J Harris1, G H Garcia, S C Logani, M L Murphy, B P Sheth, A K Seth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Although the management of orbital blow-out fractures was controversial for many years, refined imaging with computed tomography (CT) helped to narrow the poles of the debate. Many orbital surgeons currently recommend repair if fracture size portends late enophthalmos, or if diplopia has not substantially resolved within 2 weeks of the injury. While volumetric considerations have been generally well-served by this approach, ocular motility outcomes have been less than ideal. In one series, almost 50% of patients had residual diplopia 6 months after surgery. A fine network of fibrous septa that functionally unites the periosteum of the orbital floor, the inferior fibrofatty tissues, and the sheaths of the inferior rectus and oblique muscles was demonstrated by Koornneef. Entrapment between bone fragments of any of the components of this anatomic unit can limit ocular motility. Based on the pathogenesis of blow-out fractures, in which the fibrofatty-muscular complex is driven to varying degrees between bone fragments, some measure of soft tissue damage might be anticipated. Subsequent intrinsic fibrosis and contraction can tether globe movement, despite complete reduction of herniated orbital tissue from the fracture site. We postulated that the extent of this soft tissue damage might be estimated from preoperative imaging studies.
METHODS: Study criteria included: retrievable coronal CT scans; fractures of the orbital floor without rim involvement, with or without extension into the medial wall; preoperative diplopia; surgical repair by a single surgeon; complete release of entrapped tissues; and postoperative ocular motility outcomes documented with binocular visual fields (BVFs). Thirty patients met all criteria. The CT scans and BVFs were assessed by different examiners among the authors. Fractures were classified into 3 general categories and 2 subtypes to reflect the severity of soft tissue damage within each category. "Trap-door" injuries, in which bone fragments appeared to have almost perfectly realigned, were classified as type I fractures. In the I-A subtype, no orbital tissue was visible on the sinus side of the fracture line. In the I-B subtype, soft tissue with the radiodensity of orbital fat was visible within the maxillary sinus. In type II fractures, bone fragments were distracted and soft tissue was displaced between them. In the II-A subtype, soft tissue displacement was less than, or proportional to, bone fragment distraction. In the II-B subtype, soft tissue displacement was greater than bone fragment distraction. In type III fractures, displaced bone fragments surrounded displaced soft tissue in all areas. In the III-A subtype, soft tissue and bone were moderately displaced. In the III-B subtype, both were markedly displaced. Motility outcomes were quantified by measuring the vertical excursion in BVFs. The interval between trauma and surgical repair was also determined.
RESULTS: Among the 15 patients with a motility outcome in BVFs which was poorer than the median (86 degrees or less of single binocular vertical excursion), 4 patients (27%) had type A fractures; 11 patients (73%) had type B fractures. Among the 15 patients with a better outcome than the median (88 degrees or more), 10 patients (67%) had type A fractures; 5 patients (33%) had type B fractures. These differences became more defined as analysis moved away from the median. Among 5 patients with type B fractures and better than the median result in BVFs, 3 patients (60%) had surgical repair during the first week after injury. Among the 11 patients with type B fractures and less than the median result, 1 patient (9%) had repair during the first week.
CONCLUSIONS: When the CT-depicted relationship between bone fragments and soft tissues is considered, a wide spectrum of injuries is subsumed under the rubric of blow-out fractures. In general, greater degrees of soft tissue incarceration or displacement, with presumably greater intrinsic damage and subsequent fibrosis, appear to result in poorer motility outcomes. Although this retrospective study does not conclusively prove its benefit, an urgent surgical approach to selected injuries should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10360296      PMCID: PMC1298402     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc        ISSN: 0065-9533


  29 in total

1.  Early treatment of orbital floor fractures.

Authors:  B SMITH; J M CONVERSE
Journal:  Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol       Date:  1957 Sep-Oct

2.  Diagnosis and treatment of fractures of the orbital floor. A ten-year retrospective study.

Authors:  A Nathanson; S P Matthis; M Tengvar
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1992

3.  Evaluation of the field of binocular single vision in incomitant strabismus.

Authors:  R M Feibel; G Roper-Hall
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Visual loss complicating repair of orbital floor fractures.

Authors:  D H Nicholson; S W Guzak
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1971-10

5.  Incomitant vertical strabismus. Treatment with posterior fixation of the inferior rectus muscle.

Authors:  R A Saunders
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-08

6.  Orbital blowout fracture with ipsilateral fourth nerve palsy.

Authors:  M S Ruttum; G J Harris
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-08-15       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Computed tomography of the orbit with special emphasis on coronal sections: Part I. Normal anatomy.

Authors:  R Tadmor; P F New
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Volkmann's contracture of the extraocular muscles following blowout fracture.

Authors:  B Smith; R D Lisman; J Simonton; R Della Rocca
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Surgery on orbital floor fractures. Influence of time of repair and fracture size.

Authors:  M J Hawes; R K Dortzbach
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Current concepts on the management of orbital blow-out fractures.

Authors:  L Koornneef
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.539

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Isolated fractures of the orbital floor].

Authors:  O Ploder; M Oeckher; C Klug; M Voracek; G Burggasser; C Czerny
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-03

2.  Role of orthoptics and scoring system for orbital floor blowout fracture: surgical or conservative treatment.

Authors:  Juraj Timkovic; Jiri Stransky; Katerina Janurova; Petr Handlos; Jan Stembirek
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Evaluation of orbital volume in unilateral orbital fracture using computed tomography.

Authors:  Gayathri R Nair; M S Senthil Kumar
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-07-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.