Literature DB >> 10359885

Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of beta2-agonists: comparison of the enantiomers of salbutamol with racemic salbutamol and placebo.

D W Cockcroft1, B E Davis, V A Swystun, D D Marciniuk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regular use of racemic salbutamol results in the partial loss of its bronchoprotective effect. The 2 enantiomers of salbutamol, the bronchodilator R-salbutamol and nonbronchodilator S-salbutamol, are now available.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the effect of regular use of S-salbutamol, R-salbutamol, racemic salbutamol, and placebo on the bronchoprotective effect of a single dose of racemic salbutamol against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.
METHODS: Eleven of 13 well-controlled beta2 -agonist-free asthmatic subjects completed a double-blind, randomized study comparing racemic salbutamol 2.5 mg, S-salbutamol 1. 25 mg, R-salbutamol 1.25 mg, and diluent placebo nebulized and inhaled 3 times daily for 6 days (>/=6-day washout period). Ten to 12 hours after the last dose, the subjects performed measurement of FEV1, methacholine PC20, and a repeat methacholine PC20 done 1 hour after the first methacholine test and 10 minutes after 2 puffs (200 microgram) of racemic salbutamol administered from a metered-dose inhaler. The primary endpoint was the methacholine PC20 dose shift (Deltalog PC20/log 2) from before to after administration of 200 microgram of racemic salbutamol.
RESULTS: The methacholine dose shift was 3.2 doubling doses (9-fold increase in methacholine PC20 after 200 microgram of racemic salbutamol) during the placebo treatment and was unaltered (3.2) after administration of S-salbutamol. The dose shift was significantly lower after both the R-salbutamol and racemic salbutamol treatments (2.2 and 2.6 doubling doses, respectively); there was no significant difference between R-salbutamol and racemic salbutamol. There was no treatment effect on baseline FEV1, baseline methacholine PC20, or bronchodilation.
CONCLUSION: Regular treatment with racemic salbutamol or R-salbutamol, but not S-salbutamol, results in a partial loss of bronchoprotection, without loss of bronchodilation, compared with placebo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10359885     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70178-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  7 in total

Review 1.  The pharmacokinetics of levosalbutamol: what are the clinical implications?

Authors:  D W Boulton; J P Fawcett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  A population analysis of nebulized (R)-albuterol in dogs using a novel mixed gut-lung absorption PK-PD model.

Authors:  B Auclair; I W Wainer; K Fried; P Koch; T P Jerussi; M P Ducharme
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 3.  Novel drugs for treating asthma.

Authors:  T T Hansel; P J Barnes
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  Levalbuterol versus albuterol.

Authors:  Bill T Ameredes; William J Calhoun
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 5.  Levalbuterol for asthma: a better treatment?

Authors:  H William Kelly
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 6.  Managing outpatient asthma exacerbations.

Authors:  Sitesh R Roy; Henry Milgrom
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.919

Review 7.  Role of arformoterol in the management of COPD.

Authors:  Paul King
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2008
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.