Literature DB >> 10359685

Learning walks and landmark guidance in wood ants (Formica rufa)

.   

Abstract

We have examined a behaviour pattern in wood ants which in some respects resembles and in other respects differs from the learning flights of bees and wasps. Wood ants returning to their nest from a newly discovered food source turn back and look at landmarks near to the feeder, but the feeder itself does not attract sustained fixations. The frequency of landmark inspections is highest when the ant is close to the feeder and falls as the ant moves away. In common with learning flights, inspections of landmarks on departure become less frequent as ants become familiar with their surroundings and reappear after a long interval without foraging. A principal difference between the learning flights of wasps and bees and this putative learning behaviour in ants is the emphasis that ants place on landmark fixation. Ants and honeybees move differently when searching for a goal within an array of transformed landmarks. We have explored, using computer simulation, whether this difference can be explained by the prominence ants give to the matching of landmarks viewed in the frontal visual field.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10359685     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.202.13.1831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  27 in total

1.  Ant navigation en route to the goal: signature routes facilitate way-finding of Gigantiops destructor.

Authors:  D Macquart; L Garnier; M Combe; G Beugnon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Multiroute memories in desert ants.

Authors:  Stefan Sommer; Christoph von Beeren; Rüdiger Wehner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Looking and homing: how displaced ants decide where to go.

Authors:  Jochen Zeil; Ajay Narendra; Wolfgang Stürzl
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Rotation invariant visual processing for spatial memory in insects.

Authors:  Thomas Stone; Michael Mangan; Antoine Wystrach; Barbara Webb
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Three-dimensional models of natural environments and the mapping of navigational information.

Authors:  Wolfgang Stürzl; Iris Grixa; Elmar Mair; Ajay Narendra; Jochen Zeil
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  Path integration, views, search, and matched filters: the contributions of Rüdiger Wehner to the study of orientation and navigation.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Cody A Freas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Subtle changes in the landmark panorama disrupt visual navigation in a nocturnal bull ant.

Authors:  Ajay Narendra; Fiorella Ramirez-Esquivel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Skyline retention and retroactive interference in the navigating Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Christopher Whyte; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Emergence of a complex movement pattern in an unfamiliar food place by foraging ants.

Authors:  Tomoko Sakiyama
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Terrestrial cue learning and retention during the outbound and inbound foraging trip in the desert ant, Cataglyphis velox.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.