Literature DB >> 10357371

Randomized trial comparing saquinavir soft gelatin capsules versus indinavir as part of triple therapy (CHEESE study).

J W Cohen Stuart1, R Schuurman, D M Burger, P P Koopmans, H G Sprenger, J R Juttmann, C Richter, P L Meenhorst, R M Hoetelmans, F P Kroon, B Bravenboer, D Hamann, C A Boucher, J C Borleffs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and tolerability of saquinavir soft gelatin capsule (SQV-SGC) formulation and indinavir, both given as part of a triple drug regimen containing zidovudine and lamivudine, in HIV-1-infected individuals.
DESIGN: Randomized, open label, multicentre study. PATIENTS: A total of 70 patients who were antiretroviral-naive and who had a CD4 cell count < 500 x 10(6)/I and/or > 10000 HIV RNA copies/ml plasma and/or HIV-related symptoms. Subjects were assigned randomly to zidovudine 200 mg three times per day plus lamivudine 150 mg twice per day plus either SQV-SGC 1200 mg three times per day (SQV-SGC group) or indinavir 800 mg three times per day (indinavir group). Data are presented for all patients up to week 24.
RESULTS: Mean baseline CD4 cell counts (+/- SE) were 301+/-29 x 10(6) cells/l and 310 +/-43 x 10(6) cells/l in the SQV-SGC and indinavir groups, respectively. The log10 median baseline HIV RNA load was 5.00 copies/ml in the SQV-SGC group and 4.98 copies/ml in the indinavir group. No difference in antiretroviral effect between the treatment arms could be demonstrated. Intention-to-treat analysis (last observation carried forward [LOCF]) at week 24 revealed that RNA levels decreased to < 50 copies/ml in 74.3% of patients in the SQV-SGC group and in 71.4% of the patients in the indinavir group (P = 0.78). In the on-treatment analysis the proportion of patients < 50 copies/ml at week 24 was 88.0% in the SQV-SGC group and 84.6% in the indinavir group (P = 0.725). Intriguingly, the mean increase of CD4 cells in the first 24 weeks was 162+/-20 x 10(6) cells/l in the SQV-SGC group and 89+/-21 x 10(6) cells/l in the indinavir group (P = 0.01), but preliminary data indicate that this difference in CD4 cell count gain may disappear after 24 weeks of treatment. Both regimens were generally well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: During the first 24 weeks of the study, we found no difference in antiviral potency between the indinavir group and the SQV-SGC group. A significantly higher CD4 response in the SQV-SGC group was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10357371     DOI: 10.1097/00002030-199905070-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS        ISSN: 0269-9370            Impact factor:   4.177


  11 in total

1.  Clinical Pharmacologic Considerations for HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors.

Authors:  Peter L. Anderson; Courtney V. Fletcher
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Long-term suppression of viral replication despite low plasma saquinavir concentrations in the CHEESE Study.

Authors:  Rolf P G van Heeswijk; James W T Cohen Stuart; David M Burger; Jos H Beijnen; Jan C C Borleffs; Richard M W Hoetelmans
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Indinavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection.

Authors:  G L Plosker; S Noble
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily regimens of soft-gel capsule saquinavir plus minidose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus-negative adults.

Authors:  J M Kilby; G Sfakianos; N Gizzi; P Siemon-Hryczyk; E Ehrensing; C Oo; N Buss; M S Saag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Updated clinical pharmacologic considerations for HIV-1 protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Peter L Anderson; Courtney V Fletcher
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.071

6.  Saquinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics following combined ritonavir and saquinavir (soft gelatin capsules) administration.

Authors:  N Buss; P Snell; J Bock; A Hsu; K Jorga
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Saquinavir soft-gel capsule: an updated review of its use in the management of HIV infection.

Authors:  D P Figgitt; G L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence for increasing numbers of drugs in antiretroviral combination therapy.

Authors:  Rachel Jordan; Lisa Gold; Carole Cummins; Chris Hyde
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-30

9.  The cost-effectiveness of counseling strategies to improve adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy among men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Gregory S Zaric; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Margaret L Brandeau; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Cost-effectiveness of HIV screening in patients older than 55 years of age.

Authors:  Gillian D Sanders; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Mark Holodniy; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.