Literature DB >> 10356665

The process of care model for evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction. The Process of Care Consensus Panel.

.   

Abstract

This paper addresses pertinent issues concerning the role of physicians in the assessment and treatment of men with complaints of erectile dysfunction. With the availability of safe and effective oral drug therapy, the field of erectile dysfunction has expanded rapidly to encompass multiple disciplines and specialties. Recognizing the need for evidence-based standards and guidelines in the management of this common disorder, a multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to examine existing literature and practice standards. This panel employed a modified Delphi methodology to develop consensus on definition and classification, rational utilization of diagnostic and therapeutic options, and clinical guidelines for the management of erectile dysfunction in a primary care setting. A 'Process of Care Model for Erectile Dysfunction' was thus developed, incorporating a step-wise decision making approach, defined in terms of relevant processes, actions and outcomes. According to this method, initial assessment should include a careful clinical history, focused physical examination and selected laboratory tests. Subsequent management should be goal-oriented, taking into account patient and partner needs and preferences. The step-wise treatment algorithm is based on the selection criteria of ease of administration, reversibility, relative invasiveness and cost. In addition, common referral indications for specialized diagnostic testing and treatment are provided. By assisting the primary physician in selecting appropriate assessment tools and treatment interventions, the proposed guidelines are intended to optimize care of the patient with erectile dysfunction. The panel strongly recommends further research into the causes and associated risk factors for erectile dysfunction, prevention and the role of lifestyle modification, and the critical issue of partner-related sexual dysfunction. Considering the strong relationship between sexual dysfunction and overall quality of life, it is incumbent upon physicians to address the sexual needs of their patients in a sensitive and informed manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10356665     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  17 in total

Review 1.  The impact of the new sexual pharmaceuticals on sex therapy.

Authors:  M A Perelman
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  [Diagnosis of erectile dysfunction--what is still needed today?].

Authors:  W-H Weiske
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Male reproductive health after childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Lisa B Kenney; Laurie E Cohen; Margarett Shnorhavorian; Monika L Metzger; Barbara Lockart; Nobuko Hijiya; Eileen Duffey-Lind; Louis Constine; Daniel Green; Lillian Meacham
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Erectile dysfunction: diagnosis and management with newer oral agents.

Authors:  C C Carson
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2000-10

5.  The penis as a barometer of endothelial health.

Authors:  Andrew R McCullough
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

6.  An Evaluation of a Clinical Care Pathway for the Management of Men With Nonorganic Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Lawrence C Jenkins; Matthew Hall; Serkan Deveci; Patricia Guhring; Marilyn Parker; Christian J Nelson; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Optimizing outcomes of oral therapy for patients with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  James H Barada
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

Review 8.  A comparative review of the options for treatment of erectile dysfunction: which treatment for which patient?

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Dimitrios G Hatzichristou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Evaluation of the patient with erectile dysfunction: history, questionnaires, and physical examination.

Authors:  Raymond C Rosen
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 10.  Erectile dysfunction: symptom or disease?

Authors:  C Foresta; N Caretta; A Aversa; C Bettocchi; G Corona; S Mariani; M Rossato
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.