Literature DB >> 1035581

Cytoplasmic inheritance in mammalian tissue culture cells.

D C Wallace, Y Pollack, C L Bunn, J M Eisenstadt.   

Abstract

A series of intraspecific, interspecific and interorder somatic cell cybrids and hybrids have been prepared by fusions in which one of the parents contained the cytoplasmically inherited marker for chloramphenicol (CAP) resistance. A clear relationship has been established between the expression of the CAP-resistant (CAP-R) determinants in the fusion products and the genetic homology of the parents. With increased genetic divergence, the acceptability of the CAP-R mitochondria decreased. Intraspecific cybrids and hybrids of the same strain were stable for the CAP-R marker, while those between strains were stable only in CAP. Intergeneric mouse-hamster cybrids occurred at a high frequency but were unstable in CAP, while CAP suppressed hybrid formation 100-fold. Interorder cybrids (CAP-R human X CAP-S mouse) occurred either at a moderate frequency and were stable at a low frequency and were unstable in CAP. Interorder hybrids could only be formed by challenging HAT-selected hybrids with CAP or by direct selection in ouabain and CAP. Reciprocal interorder crosses between CAP-R mouse and CAP-S human cells were unsuccessful. Interspecific cybrids contain only the chromosomes of the CAP-S parent. Interspecific hybrids selected directly in CAP segregated the chromosomes of the CAP-S parent, while hybrids selected in HAT and then CAP segregated those of the CAP-R parent. The mitochondrial DNA(mtDNA) of all mouse-human cybrids and most HAT and then CAP-selected hybrids contain only the mtDNA of the CAP-S mouse parent. However, preliminary evidence suggests that one of these hybrids contains both mouse and human mtDNA sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 1035581     DOI: 10.1007/BF02835451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro        ISSN: 0073-5655


  52 in total

1.  Mitochondrial antibiotic resistance in yeast: ribosomal mutants resistant to chloramphenicol, erythromycin and spiramycin.

Authors:  L A Grivell; P Netter; P Borst; P P Slonimski
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1973-06-23

2.  The use of hybrid somatic cells as an approach to mitochondrial genetics in animals.

Authors:  I B Dawid; I Horak; H G Coon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The presence of N-formyl-methionyl-tRNA in HeLa cell mitochondria.

Authors:  J B Galper; J E Darnell
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1969-01-27       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Hybridization of somatic cells derived from mouse and syrian hamster: evolution of karyotype and enzyme studies.

Authors:  B R Migeon
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  The restriction of the recombination of mitochondrial DNA molecules in the zygotes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M F Waxman
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1975-12-09

6.  HeLa cells resistant to bromodeoxyuridine and deficient in thymidine kinase activity.

Authors:  S Kit; D R Dubbs; P M Frearson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Selection of mammalian cells resistant to a chloramphenicol analog.

Authors:  R B Wallace; K B Freeman
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Cytoplasmic transfer of chloramphenicol resistance in human tissue culture cells.

Authors:  D C Wallace; C L Bunn; J M Eisenstadt
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Effect of chloramphenicol on the ultrastructure of mitochondria in sensitive and resistant strains of HeLa.

Authors:  N Kislev; C M Spolsky; J M Eisenstadt
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Mitochondrial protein synthesis in HeLa cells.

Authors:  J B Galper
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  5 in total

1.  Interspecies mitochondrial fusion between mouse and human mitochondria is rapid and efficient.

Authors:  Young Geol Yoon; Christopher L Haug; Michael D Koob
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2006-12-09       Impact factor: 4.160

Review 2.  Mitochondrial DNA genetics and the heteroplasmy conundrum in evolution and disease.

Authors:  Douglas C Wallace; Dimitra Chalkia
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 3.  Visualizing, quantifying and manipulating mitochondrial DNA in vivo.

Authors:  David L Prole; Patrick F Chinnery; Nick S Jones
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  mtDNA lineage analysis of mouse L-cell lines reveals the accumulation of multiple mtDNA mutants and intermolecular recombination.

Authors:  Weiwei Fan; Chun Shi Lin; Prasanth Potluri; Vincent Procaccio; Douglas C Wallace
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  Visualizing, quantifying, and manipulating mitochondrial DNA in vivo.

Authors:  David L Prole; Patrick F Chinnery; Nick S Jones
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 5.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.