Literature DB >> 10355676

Cognitive motor control in human pre-supplementary motor area studied by subdural recording of discrimination/selection-related potentials.

A Ikeda1, S Yazawa, T Kunieda, S Ohara, K Terada, N Mikuni, T Nagamine, W Taki, J Kimura, H Shibasaki.   

Abstract

To clarify the functional role of human pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) in 'cognitive' motor control as compared with other non-primary motor cortices (SMA-proper and lateral premotor areas) and prefrontal area, we recorded epicortical field potentials by using subdural electrodes in five epileptic patients during presurgical evaluation, whose pre-SMA, SMA-proper, prefrontal and lateral premotor areas were defined by electric cortical stimulation and recent anatomical orientations according to the bicommissural plane and callosal grid system. An S1-Go/NoGo choice and delayed reaction task (S1-choice paradigm) and a warned choice Go/NoGo reaction task (S2-choice paradigm) with inter-stimulus intervals of 2 s were employed. The results showed (i) transient potentials with onset and peak latencies of about 200 and 600 ms, respectively, after S1 in the S1-choice paradigm mainly at pre-SMA and to a lesser degree at the prefrontal and lateral premotor areas, but not in the S2-choice paradigm. At SMA-proper, a similar but much smaller potential was seen after S1 in both S1- and S2-choice paradigms and (ii) slow sustained potentials between S1 and S2 in both S1- and S2-choice paradigms in all of the non-primary motor areas investigated (pre-SMA, SMA-proper and lateral premotor areas) and prefrontal area. It is concluded that pre-SMA plays a more important role in cognitive motor control which involves sensory discrimination and decision making or motor selection for the action after stimuli, whereas SMA-proper is one of the main generators of Bereitschaftspotential preceding self-paced, voluntary movements. In the more general anticipation of and attention to the forthcoming stimuli, non-primary motor cortices including pre-SMA, SMA-proper and lateral premotor area, and the prefrontal area are commonly involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10355676     DOI: 10.1093/brain/122.5.915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  38 in total

1.  What and when: parallel and convergent processing in motor control.

Authors:  K Sakai; O Hikosaka; R Takino; S Miyauchi; M Nielsen; T Tamada
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Altered resting-state connectivity during interictal generalized spike-wave discharges in drug-naïve childhood absence epilepsy.

Authors:  Tianhua Yang; Cheng Luo; Qifu Li; Zhiwei Guo; Ling Liu; Qiyong Gong; Dezhong Yao; Dong Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Performance monitoring local field potentials in the medial frontal cortex of primates: supplementary eye field.

Authors:  Erik E Emeric; Melanie Leslie; Pierre Pouget; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency.

Authors:  James W Moore; Diane Ruge; Dorit Wenke; John Rothwell; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Role of the left frontal aslant tract in stuttering: a brain stimulation and tractographic study.

Authors:  Rahsan Kemerdere; Nicolas Menjot de Champfleur; Jérémy Deverdun; Jérôme Cochereau; Sylvie Moritz-Gasser; Guillaume Herbet; Hugues Duffau
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Increased corticospinal excitability after 5 Hz rTMS over the human supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Kaoru Matsunaga; Atsuo Maruyama; Toshiyuki Fujiwara; Ryoji Nakanishi; Sadatoshi Tsuji; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  How does the brain respond to unimodal and bimodal sensory demand in movement of the lower extremity?

Authors:  Lewis A Wheaton; J C Mizelle; Larry W Forrester; Ou Bai; Hiroshi Shibasaki; Richard F Macko
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent.

Authors:  Daniel J Simmonds; James J Pekar; Stewart H Mostofsky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Activation of the caudal anterior cingulate cortex due to task-related interference in an auditory Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Sven Haupt; Nikolai Axmacher; Michael X Cohen; Christian E Elger; Juergen Fell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Movement related cortical potentials of cued versus self-initiated movements: double dissociated modulation by dorsal premotor cortex versus supplementary motor area rTMS.

Authors:  Ming-Kuei Lu; Noritoshi Arai; Chon-Haw Tsai; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.