Literature DB >> 10355606

Avian species differences in susceptibility to noise exposure.

B M Ryals1, R J Dooling, E Westbrook, M L Dent, A MacKenzie, O N Larsen.   

Abstract

Previous studies of hair cell regeneration and hearing recovery in birds after acoustic overstimulation have involved relatively few species. Studies of the effects of acoustic overexposure typically report high variability. Though it is impossible to tell, the data so far also suggest there may be considerable species differences in the degree of damage and the time course and extent of recovery. To examine this issue, we exposed four species of birds (quail, budgerigars, canaries, and zebra finches) to identical conditions of acoustic overstimulation and systematically analyzed changes in hearing sensitivity, basilar papilla morphology, and hair cell number. Quail and budgerigars showed the greatest susceptibility to threshold shift and hair cell loss after overstimulation with either pure tone or bandpass noise, while identical types of overstimulation in canaries and zebra finches resulted in much less of a threshold shift and a smaller, more diffuse hair cell loss. All four species showed some recovery of threshold sensitivity and hair cell number over time. Canary and zebra finch hearing and hair cell number recovered to within normal limits while quail and budgerigars continued to have an approximately 20 dB threshold shift and incomplete recovery of hair cell number. In a final experiment, birds were exposed to identical wide-band noise overstimulation under conditions of artificial middle ear ventilation. Hair cell loss was substantially increased in both budgerigars and canaries suggesting that middle ear air pressure regulation and correlated changes in middle ear transfer function are one factor influencing susceptibility to acoustic overstimulation in small birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10355606     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00022-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  The role of auditory experience in the formation of neural circuits underlying vocal learning in zebra finches.

Authors:  Soumya Iyengar; Sarah W Bottjer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Auditory experience refines cortico-basal ganglia inputs to motor cortex via remapping of single axons during vocal learning in zebra finches.

Authors:  Vanessa C Miller-Sims; Sarah W Bottjer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A Protocol for Decellularizing Mouse Cochleae for Inner Ear Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Christopher A Neal; Jennifer G Nelson-Brantley; Michael S Detamore; Hinrich Staecker; Adam J Mellott
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Electrophysiological and morphological development of the inner ear in Belgian Waterslager canaries.

Authors:  Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Robert J Dooling; Brenda Ryals; Otto Gleich
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Return of function after hair cell regeneration.

Authors:  Brenda M Ryals; Micheal L Dent; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  WDR1 presence in the songbird basilar papilla.

Authors:  Henry J Adler; Elena Sanovich; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Kai Yan; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Effects of noise on fishes: what we can learn from humans and birds.

Authors:  Robert J Dooling; Marjorie R Leek; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.654

Review 8.  Targeting cholesterol homeostasis to fight hearing loss: a new perspective.

Authors:  Brigitte Malgrange; Isabel Varela-Nieto; Philippe de Medina; Michael R Paillasse
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Selective and efficient neural coding of communication signals depends on early acoustic and social environment.

Authors:  Noopur Amin; Michael Gastpar; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Aircraft sound exposure leads to song frequency decline and elevated aggression in wild chiffchaffs.

Authors:  Andrew D Wolfenden; Hans Slabbekoorn; Karolina Kluk; Selvino R de Kort
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.091

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.