Literature DB >> 10355604

Ensemble responses of the auditory nerve to normal and whispered stop consonants.

H E Stevens1, R E Wickesberg.   

Abstract

Whispered syllables lack many of the frequency and voicing cues of normally voiced speech, but these two acoustically distinct forms of speech are placed into the same linguistic categories. To examine how whispered and voiced speech are encoded in the auditory system, the responses to speech sounds were recorded from 132 single auditory nerve fibers in 20 ketamine anesthetized chinchillas. Stimuli were the naturally produced syllables /da/ and /ta/ presented in whispered and normal voicing. The results for each syllable presented at a fixed intensity were analyzed by pooling the responses from individual auditory nerve fibers across animals to create a global average peri-stimulus time (GAPST) histogram. For each word-initial consonant, the pattern of peaks in the GAPST was the same for both normal and whispered speech. For the vowel the GAPSTs for the whispered speech sounds did not display the synchronization observed in the responses to the voiced syllables. The temporal pattern of the peaks was constant over a 40 dB intensity range, although peak sizes varied. Grouping fibers within different frequency ranges created local averages (LAPST) that revealed the significant contribution of high frequency fibers in the response to the whispered consonants. Responses of individual fibers varied with both the syllable and the voicing. These findings suggest that the encoding of either a whispered or a normal stop consonant results in the same temporal pattern in the ensemble response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10355604     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00014-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

1.  Stimulus-dependent auditory tuning results in synchronous population coding of vocalizations in the songbird midbrain.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Patrick R Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Role of intrinsic conductances underlying responses to transients in octopus cells of the cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  N L Golding; M J Ferragamo; D Oertel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Three psychophysical metrics of auditory temporal integration in macaques.

Authors:  Chase Mackey; Alejandro Tarabillo; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  A dynamical point process model of auditory nerve spiking in response to complex sounds.

Authors:  Andrea Trevino; Todd P Coleman; Jont Allen
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Stochastic undersampling steepens auditory threshold/duration functions: implications for understanding auditory deafferentation and aging.

Authors:  Frédéric Marmel; Medardo A Rodríguez-Mendoza; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 6.  Why do I hear but not understand? Stochastic undersampling as a model of degraded neural encoding of speech.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.