BACKGROUND: Patients with poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors according to the IGCCC have a poor long-term survival. This study evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of the intensive alternating chemotherapy regimen BOMP/EPI in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with IGCCC poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors treated at 13 centres were studied. Treatment consisted of bleomycin 30 mg, vincristine 2 mg, methotrexate 300 mg/m2 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (BOMP), alternating after a 14-day interval with etoposide 120 mg/m2 day 1-4, ifosfamide 1.3 g/m2 day 1-4 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 day 1-4 (EPI). BOMP was administered 21 days after the EPI. Bleomycin was administered weekly per 12 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were treated. The median number of cycles administered was 7 (1-10 cycles). Eighteen patients achieved complete responses with chemotherapy alone (12 had necrosis and 2 mature teratoma at postchemotherapy resection), and four achieved complete responses with chemotherapy and surgical resection of viable cancer. Thus, an overall favorable response was achieved in 22 patients (60%). Four additional patients had marker-negative non-resected residual masses. Eleven patients were considered treatment failures, including one who died early and another who succumbed to granulocytopenic sepsis and renal failure. Hematologic toxicity was the most common, with 26 patients (70%) having grade 4 granulocytopenia. After a median follow-up of 41 months, the actuarial two-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 64% and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSION: BOMP/EPI is active in poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors according to the IGCCC criteria. The results obtained compare favorably with those expected with conventional chemotherapy, and justify further studies.
BACKGROUND:Patients with poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors according to the IGCCC have a poor long-term survival. This study evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of the intensive alternating chemotherapy regimen BOMP/EPI in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with IGCCC poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors treated at 13 centres were studied. Treatment consisted of bleomycin 30 mg, vincristine 2 mg, methotrexate 300 mg/m2 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (BOMP), alternating after a 14-day interval with etoposide 120 mg/m2 day 1-4, ifosfamide 1.3 g/m2 day 1-4 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 day 1-4 (EPI). BOMP was administered 21 days after the EPI. Bleomycin was administered weekly per 12 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were treated. The median number of cycles administered was 7 (1-10 cycles). Eighteen patients achieved complete responses with chemotherapy alone (12 had necrosis and 2 mature teratoma at postchemotherapy resection), and four achieved complete responses with chemotherapy and surgical resection of viable cancer. Thus, an overall favorable response was achieved in 22 patients (60%). Four additional patients had marker-negative non-resected residual masses. Eleven patients were considered treatment failures, including one who died early and another who succumbed to granulocytopenic sepsis and renal failure. Hematologic toxicity was the most common, with 26 patients (70%) having grade 4 granulocytopenia. After a median follow-up of 41 months, the actuarial two-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 64% and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSION:BOMP/EPI is active in poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors according to the IGCCC criteria. The results obtained compare favorably with those expected with conventional chemotherapy, and justify further studies.
Authors: R Girones; J Aparicio; P Roure; J R Germa-Lluch; X García Del Muro; S Vazquez-Estevez; A Saenz; J Sastre; J Arranz Arija; E Gallardo; E Gonzalez-Billalabeitia; A Sanchez-Hernandez; J Terrasa; A Hernandez; C Santander; E Cillan; N Sagastibelza; D Almenar-Cubells; M Lopez Brea; J P Maroto Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: S D Fosså; B Paluchowska; A Horwich; G Kaiser; P H M de Mulder; O Koriakine; A T van Oosterom; L de Prijck; L Collette; R de Wit Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-11-28 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: K Fizazi; D M Prow; K-A Do; X Wang; L Finn; J Kim; D Daliani; C N Papandreou; S-M Tu; R E Millikan; L C Pagliaro; C J Logothetis; R J Amato Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2002-05-20 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: D A Anthoney; M J McKean; J T Roberts; A W Hutcheon; J Graham; W Jones; J Paul; S B Kaye Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-02-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: J Shamash; T Powles; W Ansell; Dan Berney; J Stebbing; K Mutsvangwa; P Wilson; S Asterling; S Liu; P Wyatt; S P Joel; R T D Oliver Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Isabel Blancas; Nuria Cárdenas; Mayte Delgado; Jose Miguel Jurado; Marta Legeren; Ana Villaescusa; Fernando Galvez; Marisol Yelamos Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: A J Zurita; J E Diestra; E Condom; X García Del Muro; G L Scheffer; R J Scheper; J Pérez; J R Germà-Lluch; M A Izquierdo Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-03-24 Impact factor: 7.640