Literature DB >> 10354851

[Life-cycle assessment of single-use versus reusable surgical drapes (cellulose/polyethylene-mixed cotton system)].

M Dettenkofer1, R Griesshammer, M Scherrer, F Daschner.   

Abstract

Surgical drapes made of cotton are under increasing competition with various disposable products and reusable draping systems (e.g., made of synthetic fabrics like polyester). When making a choice to use one of these medical devices in practical surgery, major aspects like handling, hygienic safety and costs, but also environmental effects have to be taken into account. In this study a mixed system for patient drapes (reusable cotton drapes combined with a reduced set of impermeable single-use drapes made of cellulose/polyethylene) was compared to a system that is only based on single-use drapes with regard to ecology [life-cycle assessment (LCA)]. The medical literature was reviewed to assess important medical aspects of the use of patient drapes, resulting in the statement that there are no conclusive arguments to support a clear hygienic superiority of one of these alternatives. Based on the conditions assumed and stated, the results of the LCA indicate that the mixed draping system is associated with two times more total energy consumption. In addition, more water is needed and more CO2 emissions are produced. However, draping with the single-use product results in more clinical waste. Regarding water pollution no system proved superior. It is difficult to compare and weigh various environmental aspects like the polluting cultivation of cotton in distant countries (reusable drapes) and the higher figure of transportation necessary to deliver the single-use product within Germany. It is an important disadvantage of the mixed system that it combines the ecological burden of both cotton drapes and the single-use alternative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10354851     DOI: 10.1007/s001040050677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  6 in total

1.  [IKOP-Infection control in the operating theatreConsensus on the theme "Barrier measures during operations and invasive procedures"].

Authors:  B Salzberger; M Dettenkofer; F M Baer; O Cornely; M Herrmann; J Höher; S Lemmen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Does the type of surgical drape (disposable versus non-disposable) affect the risk of subsequent surgical site infection?

Authors:  David C Kieser; Michael C Wyatt; Andrew Beswick; Setor Kunutsor; Gary J Hooper
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

3.  Environmental impacts of surgical procedures: life cycle assessment of hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Cassandra L Thiel; Matthew Eckelman; Richard Guido; Matthew Huddleston; Amy E Landis; Jodi Sherman; Scott O Shrake; Noe Copley-Woods; Melissa M Bilec
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  The Environmental footprint of morphine: a life cycle assessment from opium poppy farming to the packaged drug.

Authors:  Scott McAlister; Yanjun Ou; Elise Neff; Karen Hapgood; David Story; Philip Mealey; Forbes McGain
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Evaluation of reprocessing medical devices in 14 German regional hospitals and at 27 medical practitioners' offices within the European context - consequences for European harmonization.

Authors:  Birgit Thiede; Axel Kramer
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2013-11-06

Review 6.  Environmental sustainability in anaesthesia and critical care.

Authors:  Forbes McGain; Jane Muret; Cathy Lawson; Jodi D Sherman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 9.166

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.