Literature DB >> 10353907

Among-locus variation in Fst: fish, allozymes and the Lewontin-Krakauer test revisited.

C F Baer1.   

Abstract

Variation among loci in the distribution of allele frequencies among subpopulations is well known; how to tell when the variation exceeds that expected when all loci are subject to uniform evolutionary processes is not well known. If locus-specific effects are important, the ability to detect those effects should vary with the level of gene flow. Populations with low gene flow should exhibit greater variation among loci in Fst than populations with high gene flow, because gene flow acts to homogenize allele frequencies among subpopulations. Here I use Lewontin and Krakauer's k statistic to describe the variance among allozyme loci in 102 published data sets from fishes. As originally proposed, k >> 2 was considered evidence that the variation in Fst among loci is greater than expected from neutral evolution. Although that interpretation is invalid, large differences in k in different populations suggest that locus-specific forces may be important in shaping genetic diversity. In these data, k is not greater for populations with expected low levels of gene flow than for populations with expected high levels of gene flow. There is thus no evidence that locus-specific forces are of general importance in shaping the distribution of allele frequencies at enzyme loci among populations of fishes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10353907      PMCID: PMC1460626     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  13 in total

1.  Letters to the editors: Lewontin-Krakauer test for neutral genes.

Authors:  M Nei; T Maruyama
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Letters to the editors: Remarks on the Lewontin-Krakauer test.

Authors:  A Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Gene frequency distributions as a test of selective neutrality.

Authors:  A Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Drift variances of FST and GST statistics obtained from a finite number of isolated populations.

Authors:  M Nei; A Chakravarti
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 5.  Population genetics theory in relation to the neutralist-selectionist controversy.

Authors:  W J Ewens
Journal:  Adv Hum Genet       Date:  1977

6.  Population structure and human evolution.

Authors:  L L Cavalli-Sforza
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1966-03-22

7.  Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Distribution of gene frequency as a test of the theory of the selective neutrality of polymorphisms.

Authors:  R C Lewontin; J Krakauer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision.

Authors:  J F Crow; K Aoki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genetic population structure and gene flow in the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua: a comparison of allozyme and nuclear RFLP loci.

Authors:  G H Pogson; K A Mesa; R G Boutilier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  9 in total

1.  Fusion-fission experiments in Aphidius: evolutionary split without isolation in response to environmental bimodality.

Authors:  I Emelianov; A Hernandes-Lopez; M Torrence; N Watts
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Genetic variability at neutral markers, quantitative trait land trait in a subdivided population under selection.

Authors:  Valérie Le Corre; Antoine Kremer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Population genetic structuring in Acanthopagrus butcheri (Pisces: Sparidae): does low gene flow among estuaries apply to both sexes?

Authors:  Christopher P Burridge; Vincent L Versace
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Multiple mating and reproductive skew in parental and introgressed females of the live-bearing fish Xiphophorus birchmanni.

Authors:  Kimberly A Paczolt; Courtney N Passow; Pablo J Delclos; Holly K Kindsvater; Adam G Jones; Gil G Rosenthal
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.645

6.  Detecting population structure in a high gene-flow species, Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus): direct, simultaneous evaluation of neutral vs putatively selected loci.

Authors:  C André; L C Larsson; L Laikre; D Bekkevold; J Brigham; G R Carvalho; T G Dahlgren; W F Hutchinson; S Mariani; K Mudde; D E Ruzzante; N Ryman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Susan Bassham; Paul D Etter; Nicholas Stiffler; Eric A Johnson; William A Cresko
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  The population structure and recent colonization history of Oregon threespine stickleback determined using restriction-site associated DNA-sequencing.

Authors:  Julian Catchen; Susan Bassham; Taylor Wilson; Mark Currey; Conor O'Brien; Quick Yeates; William A Cresko
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Inter-chromosomal variation in the pattern of human population genetic structure.

Authors:  Tesfaye M Baye
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.