Literature DB >> 10352372

[Problems of study designs with randomization, blinding and placebos].

P Heusser1.   

Abstract

As randomised double-blind trials are not rarely demanded as a prerequisite for the scientific acceptance of complementary medicine, the author has analysed the soundness of this demand on the basis of the international literature. As a result there appeared a number of methodological, practical and ethical problems which question the theoretically deduced primal value of this study design relative to the needs of medical practice and of health insurance issues. The experimental instruments of randomisation, blinding and placebo deliberately exclude essential therapeutic factors which are integral elements of complementary medical concepts; therefore, it is suggested to supplement quantitatively and collectively oriented experimental research by non-experimental procedures, which adequately reflect the context- and practice-related individual reality.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10352372     DOI: 10.1159/000021215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forsch Komplementarmed        ISSN: 1021-7096


  3 in total

1.  Checklist for the qualitative evaluation of clinical studies with particular focus on external validity and model validity.

Authors:  Gudrun Bornhöft; Stefanie Maxion-Bergemann; Ursula Wolf; Gunver S Kienle; Andreas Michalsen; Horst C Vollmar; Simon Gilbertson; Peter F Matthiessen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Equivalence and Non-inferiority Trials of CAM.

Authors:  Edzard Ernst
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 2.629

3.  Mistletoe Preparation Iscador: Are there Methodological Concerns with Respect to Controlled Clinical Trials?

Authors:  Renatus Ziegler
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.629

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.