Literature DB >> 10352052

What is recommended for healthy women during pregnancy? A comparison of seven prenatal clinical practice guideline documents.

M Haertsch, E Campbell, R Sanson-Fisher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several countries have developed clinical practice guidelines for the content of prenatal care. This study examines the consistency of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines describing routine prenatal care.
METHODS: The recommendations for low-risk women in seven guideline documents were examined: two from Australia, two from the United States, two from Canada, and one from Germany. The recommendations were listed into the four areas of "general health screening and health promotion during pregnancy," "organization of care," "clinical tests and screening," and "education specific for pregnancy."
RESULTS: A total of 69 recommendations were identified within the seven documents, most of which fell within the "clinical tests and screening" domain. Notable differences were identified in the number of recommendations made within the same country. Of the 69 recommendations, only four were included in all seven documents.
CONCLUSION: Little consistency was demonstrated within or among countries in terms of the content of their prenatal care guidelines, suggesting a need to reexamine their content and the evidence on which such recommendations are based.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10352052     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.1999.00024.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  5 in total

1.  Pregnancy planning guide. Evidence-based information for prospective parents.

Authors:  Krista M Maier; Colleen M Kirkham; Elizabeth Lim; Ka Wai Cheung; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Screening tests during prenatal care: does practice follow the evidence?

Authors:  Juned Siddique; John D Lantos; Tyler J VanderWeele; Diane S Lauderdale
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-11-28

3.  Decision-making and evidence use during the process of prenatal record review in Canada: a multiphase qualitative study.

Authors:  Sonia Semenic; Nancy Edwards; Shahirose Premji; Joanne Olson; Beverly Williams; Phyllis Montgomery
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Provincial prenatal record revision: a multiple case study of evidence-based decision-making at the population-policy level.

Authors:  Nancy Edwards; Sonia Semenic; Shahirose Premji; Phyllis Montgomery; Beverly Williams; Joanne Olson; Omaima Mansi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Knowledge about the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease is independently associated with variation in diet quality during pregnancy.

Authors:  Luseadra McKerracher; Tina Moffat; Mary Barker; Meghan McConnell; Stephanie A Atkinson; Beth Murray-Davis; Sarah D McDonald; Deborah M Sloboda
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.092

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.