Literature DB >> 10350468

Structural changes in the transition state of protein folding: alternative interpretations of curved chevron plots.

D E Otzen1, O Kristensen, M Proctor, M Oliveberg.   

Abstract

The interpretation of folding rates is often rationalized within the context of transition state theory. This means that the reaction rate is linked to an activation barrier, the height of which is determined by the free energy difference between a ground state (the starting point) and an apparent transition state. Changes in the folding kinetics are thus caused by effects on either the ground state, the transition state, or both. However, structural changes of the transition state are rarely discussed in connection with experimental data, and kinetic anomalies are commonly ascribed to ground state effects alone, e.g., depletion or accumulation of structural intermediates upon addition of denaturant. In this study, we present kinetic data which are best described by transition state changes. We also show that ground state effects and transition state effects are in general difficult to distinguish kinetically. The analysis is based on the structurally homologous proteins U1A and S6. Both proteins display two-state behavior, but there is a marked difference in their kinetics. S6 exhibits a classical V-shaped chevron plot (log observed rate constant vs denaturant concentration), whereas U1A's chevron plot is symmetrically curved, like an inverted bell curve. However, S6 is readily mutated to display U1A-like kinetics. The seemingly drastic effects of these mutations are readily ascribed to transition state movements where large kinetic differences result from relatively small alterations of a common free energy profile and broad activation barriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10350468     DOI: 10.1021/bi982819j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  48 in total

1.  From snapshot to movie: phi analysis of protein folding transition states taken one step further.

Authors:  T Ternström; U Mayor; M Akke; M Oliveberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Folding rate prediction using total contact distance.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  N-terminal extension changes the folding mechanism of the FK506-binding protein.

Authors:  A Korepanova; C Douglas; I Leyngold; T M Logan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Absence of stable intermediates on the folding pathway of barnase.

Authors:  J Takei; R A Chu; Y Bai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Fast protein folding kinetics.

Authors:  Jack Schonbrun; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Free-energy landscapes of ion-channel gating are malleable: changes in the number of bound ligands are accompanied by changes in the location of the transition state in acetylcholine-receptor channels.

Authors:  Claudio Grosman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Experimental evaluation of topological parameters determining protein-folding rates.

Authors:  Erik J Miller; Kael F Fischer; Susan Marqusee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Scattered Hammond plots reveal second level of site-specific information in protein folding: phi' (beta++).

Authors:  Linda Hedberg; Mikael Oliveberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Multiple folding pathways of the SH3 domain.

Authors:  Jose M Borreguero; Feng Ding; Sergey V Buldyrev; H Eugene Stanley; Nikolay V Dokholyan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Trimming down a protein structure to its bare foldons: spatial organization of the cooperative unit.

Authors:  Ellinor Haglund; Jens Danielsson; Saraboji Kadhirvel; Magnus O Lindberg; Derek T Logan; Mikael Oliveberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.