BACKGROUND: Thoracic splenosis is a rare event, and fine needle aspiration (FNA) of a pleural implant of splenic tissue can be a pitfall when previous anamnestic data are ignored. CASE: A 53-year-old male underwent FNA of a left thoracic subpleural nodule highly suggestive of a metastatic lesion. The presence of a population of small and medium-sized lymphocytes suggested the possibility of lymphoproliferative disease; frozen sections confirmed this possibility. The final diagnosis was normal splenic tissue. Twenty-five years earlier the patient sustained a gunshot wound in the left side of the upper abdomen followed by splenectomy and drainage of the left pleural cavity because of mild, concomitant hemothorax. CONCLUSION: A left pleural thoracic nodule in subjects with a previous history of traumatic rupture of the spleen must be considered highly suggestive of thoracic splenosis. Scintigraphy with Tc 99 m and magnetic resonance imaging are diagnostic, while FNA, especially in the absence of anamnestic data, can create a pitfall that can induce inappropriate removal of ectopic, normally functioning splenic tissue.
BACKGROUND:Thoracic splenosis is a rare event, and fine needle aspiration (FNA) of a pleural implant of splenic tissue can be a pitfall when previous anamnestic data are ignored. CASE: A 53-year-old male underwent FNA of a left thoracic subpleural nodule highly suggestive of a metastatic lesion. The presence of a population of small and medium-sized lymphocytes suggested the possibility of lymphoproliferative disease; frozen sections confirmed this possibility. The final diagnosis was normal splenic tissue. Twenty-five years earlier the patient sustained a gunshot wound in the left side of the upper abdomen followed by splenectomy and drainage of the left pleural cavity because of mild, concomitant hemothorax. CONCLUSION: A left pleural thoracic nodule in subjects with a previous history of traumatic rupture of the spleen must be considered highly suggestive of thoracic splenosis. Scintigraphy with Tc 99 m and magnetic resonance imaging are diagnostic, while FNA, especially in the absence of anamnestic data, can create a pitfall that can induce inappropriate removal of ectopic, normally functioning splenic tissue.