Literature DB >> 10348768

Comparison of the toxicity of amphotericin B in 5% dextrose with that of amphotericin B in fat emulsion in a randomized trial with cancer patients.

M Nucci1, M Loureiro, F Silveira, A R Casali, L F Bouzas, E Velasco, N Spector, W Pulcheri.   

Abstract

A multicentric randomized trial was undertaken to compare the toxicity of amphotericin B in 5% dextrose with that of amphotericin B in a fat emulsion (Intralipid) in cancer patients. Group 1 (n = 33) received amphotericin B diluted in 5% dextrose with premedication consisting of promethazine plus an antipyretic. Group 2 (n = 28) received amphotericin B diluted in 20% Intralipid without premedication. Amphotericin B was infused daily at a dose of 1 mg/kg of body weight over a 1-h period to members of both groups for empirical antifungal therapy (in neutropenic patients) or for the treatment of documented fungal infections. The majority of patients (80%) received empirical amphotericin B treatment. The two groups were comparable with regard to age, gender, underlying disease, and the following baseline characteristics: use of other nephrotoxic drugs and serum levels of potassium and creatinine. The median cumulative doses of amphotericin B were 240 mg in group 1 and 245 mg in group 2 (P = 0.73). Acute adverse events occurred in 88% of patients in group 1 and in 71% of those in group 2 (P = 0.11). Forty percent of the infusions in group 1 were associated with fever, compared to 23% in group 2 (P < 0.0001). In addition, patients in group 2 required less meperidine for the control of acute adverse events (P = 0.008), and fewer members of this group presented with hypokalemia (P = 0.004) or rigors (P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the proportions of patients with nephrotoxicity (P = 0.44). The success rates of empirical antifungal treatment were similar in the two groups (P = 0.9). Amphotericin B diluted in a lipid emulsion seems to be associated with a smaller number of acute adverse events and fewer cases of hypokalemia than amphotericin B diluted in 5% dextrose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10348768      PMCID: PMC89294          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.43.6.1445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  15 in total

Review 1.  Clinical use of amphotericin B and derivatives: lore, mystique, and fact.

Authors:  P D Hoeprich
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Pretreatment regimens for adverse events related to infusion of amphotericin B.

Authors:  S D Goodwin; J D Cleary; C A Walawander; J W Taylor; T H Grasela
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Lipid formulations for amphotericin B: does the emperor need new clothes?

Authors:  J R Graybill
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Administering amphotericin B--a practical approach.

Authors:  S H Khoo; J Bond; D W Denning
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  An emulsion formulation of amphotericin B improves the therapeutic index when treating systemic murine candidiasis.

Authors:  R Kirsh; R Goldstein; J Tarloff; D Parris; J Hook; N Hanna; P Bugelski; G Poste
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Safety and toxicity of amphotericin B in glucose 5% or intralipid 20% in neutropenic patients with pneumonia or fever of unknown origin: randomised study.

Authors:  P Schöffski; M Freund; R Wunder; D Petersen; C H Köhne; H Hecker; U Schubert; A Ganser
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-08

7.  A controlled trial of the tolerance of amphotericin B infused in dextrose or in Intralipid in patients with haematological malignancies.

Authors:  D Caillot; G Reny; E Solary; O Casasnovas; P Chavanet; B Bonnotte; L Perello; M Dumas; F Entezam; H Guy
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Trial of glucose versus fat emulsion in preparation of amphotericin for use in HIV infected patients with candidiasis.

Authors:  P Y Chavanet; I Garry; N Charlier; D Caillot; J P Kisterman; M D'Athis; H Portier
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-17

9.  Rapid intravenous infusion of amphotericin B: a pilot study.

Authors:  J M Cruz; J E Peacock; L Loomer; L W Holder; G W Evans; B L Powell; E S Lyerly; R L Capizzi
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Reduced renal toxicity and improved clinical tolerance of amphotericin B mixed with intralipid compared with conventional amphotericin B in neutropenic patients.

Authors:  P Moreau; N Milpied; N Fayette; J F Ramée; J L Harousseau
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Amphotericin B lipid soluble formulations versus amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia.

Authors:  Helle Krogh Johansen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-04

2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the tolerability and hepatotoxicity of antifungals in empirical and definitive therapy for invasive fungal infection.

Authors:  Jiun-Ling Wang; Chia-Hsuin Chang; Yinong Young-Xu; K Arnold Chan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Incidence, Predictors, and Impact on Hospital Mortality of Amphotericin B Nephrotoxicity Defined Using Newer Acute Kidney Injury Diagnostic Criteria.

Authors:  Paulo Novis Rocha; Carla Dinamérica Kobayashi; Luna de Carvalho Almeida; Camilla de Oliveira Dos Reis; Barbara Mendes Santos; Marshall Jay Glesby
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Role of diuretics and lipid formulations in the prevention of amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Iman Karimzadeh; Hossein Khalili; Shadi Farsaei; Simin Dashti-Khavidaki; Mohammad Mahdi Sagheb
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Reduction of amphotericin B-induced renal tubular apoptosis by N-acetylcysteine.

Authors:  Z Odabasi; A Karaalp; H Cermik; J Mohr; E T Tigen; M Koc; V Korten
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Fungal infection-related mortality versus total mortality as an outcome in trials of antifungal agents.

Authors:  Anne K Due; Helle K Johansen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Evaluation of intravenous regional perfusion with amphotericin B and dimethylsulfoxide to treat horses for pythiosis of a limb.

Authors:  Renata G S Dória; Mariana B Carvalho; Silvio H Freitas; Luciane M Laskoski; Edson M Colodel; Fábio S Mendonça; Marco A G Silva; Renan Grigoletto; Paulo Fantinato Neto
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Inhibition of biofilm formation and lipase in Candida albicans by culture filtrate of Staphylococcus epidermidis in vitro.

Authors:  Sayan Bhattacharyya; Prashant Gupta; Gopa Banerjee; Amita Jain; Mastan Singh
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2014-09

9.  Use of antifungal drugs in hematology.

Authors:  Marcio Nucci
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2012

10.  Treatment of invasive candidiasis in the elderly: a review.

Authors:  Aikaterini Flevari; Maria Theodorakopoulou; Aristea Velegraki; Apostolos Armaganidis; George Dimopoulos
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.