Literature DB >> 10348478

Advantages of a modified scoring method for the Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale.

C G Goetz1, E J Pappert, E D Louis, R Raman, S Leurgans.   

Abstract

Previously, we published a video-based objective rating scale of tics that met reliability and validity criteria for measurement of five domains of tic disability. In the original form, the scale's metric properties did not permit internal comparison of each of the five domains of impairment and did not provide a total score for use as a primary outcome measure. In this study, we retained the original scale and videotape protocol but tested whether a modified scoring system corrected these limitations. The new scoring method rated assigned tic data to ratings of 0-4 on five disability categories: number of body areas, frequency of motor tics, frequency of phonic tics, severity of motor tics, and severity of phonic tics. The sums of these ratings yielded a total score of overall tic disability (0-20). In a series of 31 patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, we assessed Spearman correlation coefficients for the old and new scoring systems as well as the correlation of the new ratings with the objectively derived sections of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS), another valid and reliable scale used in clinical practice and research. For each domain, the rank order for the scores on the original scale was well retained in the new scores. Likewise, for each domain, ranking with the new scoring system correlated well with scores on the comparable objective item from the YGTSS. The new total score accurately captured the rank order of the combined five domains from the original scale and correlated well with the total objective motor plus phonic tic score from the YGTSS and the YGTSS Tourette Syndrome Overall Impairment Rating. These data demonstrate that the modified videotape-based scoring system retains the essential information gathered in the original Rush scale. The modification provides comparisons among the five assessed domains and a total objectively based disability score that can be used as a single outcome measure for assessing tic disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10348478     DOI: 10.1002/1531-8257(199905)14:3<502::aid-mds1020>3.0.co;2-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mov Disord        ISSN: 0885-3185            Impact factor:   10.338


  33 in total

1.  Reactivity of tic observation procedures to situation and setting.

Authors:  John Piacentini; Michael B Himle; Susanna Chang; David E Baruch; Brian A Buzzella; Amanda Pearlman; Douglas W Woods
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2006-10

Review 2.  Systematic review of severity scales and screening instruments for tics: Critique and recommendations.

Authors:  Davide Martino; Tamara M Pringsheim; Andrea E Cavanna; Carlo Colosimo; Andreas Hartmann; James F Leckman; Sheng Luo; Alexander Munchau; Christopher G Goetz; Glenn T Stebbins; Pablo Martinez-Martin
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 3.  Current behavioral assessments of movement disorders in children.

Authors:  Tetsuya Asakawa; Kenji Sugiyama; Takao Nozaki; Tetsuro Sameshima; Susumu Kobayashi; Liang Wang; Zhen Hong; Shu-Jiao Chen; Can-Dong Li; Ding Ding; Hiroki Namba
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 4.  A Review and Update on Tourette Syndrome: Where Is the Field Headed?

Authors:  Aysegul Gunduz; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Post-traumatic tics and tetrabenazine treatment: a blinded video assessment.

Authors:  Markos Poulopoulos; Mirna Hajjar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-12-05

6.  Striatal [11C]dihydrotetrabenazine and [11C]methylphenidate binding in Tourette syndrome.

Authors:  R L Albin; R A Koeppe; K Wernette; W Zhuang; T Nichols; M R Kilbourn; K A Frey
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Scheduled, intermittent stimulation of the thalamus reduces tics in Tourette syndrome.

Authors:  P Justin Rossi; Enrico Opri; Jonathan B Shute; Rene Molina; Dawn Bowers; Herbert Ward; Kelly D Foote; Aysegul Gunduz; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.891

Review 8.  Deep brain stimulation in Tourette's Syndrome.

Authors:  Linda Ackermans; Yasin Temel; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens and the internal capsule in therapeutically refractory Tourette-syndrome.

Authors:  Jens Kuhn; Doris Lenartz; Jürgen K Mai; Wolfgang Huff; Sun-Hee Lee; Athanasios Koulousakis; Joachim Klosterkoetter; Volker Sturm
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Report of a patient undergoing chronic responsive deep brain stimulation for Tourette syndrome: proof of concept.

Authors:  Rene Molina; Michael S Okun; Jonathan B Shute; Enrico Opri; P Justin Rossi; Daniel Martinez-Ramirez; Kelly D Foote; Aysegul Gunduz
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.115

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.