M J Lowe1, D P Russell. 1. Department of Radiology, Imaging Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202-5111, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Gradual drifting of baseline signal intensity is common in functional MRI (fMRI) time course data. Methods for dealing with this effect are studied. METHOD: Simulations and fMRI data are used to study three statistical models that account for baseline drift. A method is proposed in which the time course data are linear least-squares fit to a reference function that includes the slope of the baseline drift as a free parameter. RESULTS: It is shown that the least-squares method is equivalent to cross-correlation with Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization. Additionally, it is shown that certain paradigm designs improve the sensitivity of statistical tests when using any of the drift correction methods commonly employed. The least-squares method results in a variety of useful parameters such as activation amplitude, with a well characterized error. CONCLUSION: Very simple techniques can effectively account for observed drifts. It is important to design paradigms that are symmetric about the midpoint of the time series. In calculating confidence levels, a proper statistical model that accounts for baseline drifts is necessary to ensure accurate confidence level assessment.
PURPOSE: Gradual drifting of baseline signal intensity is common in functional MRI (fMRI) time course data. Methods for dealing with this effect are studied. METHOD: Simulations and fMRI data are used to study three statistical models that account for baseline drift. A method is proposed in which the time course data are linear least-squares fit to a reference function that includes the slope of the baseline drift as a free parameter. RESULTS: It is shown that the least-squares method is equivalent to cross-correlation with Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization. Additionally, it is shown that certain paradigm designs improve the sensitivity of statistical tests when using any of the drift correction methods commonly employed. The least-squares method results in a variety of useful parameters such as activation amplitude, with a well characterized error. CONCLUSION: Very simple techniques can effectively account for observed drifts. It is important to design paradigms that are symmetric about the midpoint of the time series. In calculating confidence levels, a proper statistical model that accounts for baseline drifts is necessary to ensure accurate confidence level assessment.
Authors: S Posse; F Binkofski; F Schneider; D Gembris; W Frings; U Habel; J B Salloum; K Mathiak; S Wiese; V Kiselev; T Graf; B Elghahwagi; M L Grosse-Ruyken; T Eickermann Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: D Cordes; V M Haughton; K Arfanakis; G J Wendt; P A Turski; C H Moritz; M A Quigley; M E Meyerand Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: D Cordes; V M Haughton; K Arfanakis; J D Carew; P A Turski; C H Moritz; M A Quigley; M E Meyerand Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.825