Literature DB >> 10348422

Bayesian approaches to the value of information: implications for the regulation of new pharmaceuticals.

K Claxton1.   

Abstract

The current regulation of new pharmaceuticals is inefficient because it demands arbitrary amounts of information, the type of information demanded is not relevant to decision-makers and the same standards of evidence are applied across different technologies. Bayesian decision theory and an analysis of the value of both perfect and sample information is used to consider the efficient regulation of new pharmaceuticals. This type of analysis can be used to decide whether the evidence in an economic study provides 'sufficient substantiation' for an economic claim, and assesses whether evidence can be regarded as 'competent and reliable'.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10348422     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199905)8:3<269::aid-hec425>3.0.co;2-d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  30 in total

Review 1.  Advantages of using the net-benefit approach for analysing uncertainty in economic evaluation studies.

Authors:  Niklas Zethraeus; Magnus Johannesson; Bengt Jönsson; Mickael Löthgren; Magnus Tambour
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Role of pharmacoeconomic analysis in R&D decision making: when, where, how?

Authors:  Paul Miller
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The need for microsimulation to evaluate osteoporosis interventions.

Authors:  David J Vanness; Anna N A Tosteson; Sherine E Gabriel; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Do pharmacogenomic tests provide value to policy makers?

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  It's time to choose the study design!: net benefit analysis of alternative study designs to acquire information for evaluation of health technologies.

Authors:  Oren Shavit; Moshe Leshno; Assaf Goldberger; Amir Shmueli; Amnon Hoffman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  The contrast and convergence of Bayesian and frequentist statistical approaches in pharmacoeconomic analysis.

Authors:  Grant H Skrepnek
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  A decision-theoretic framework for the application of cost-effectiveness analysis in regulatory processes.

Authors:  Gianluca Baio; Pierluigi Russo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Cost-utility of ranolazine for the symptomatic treatment of patients with chronic angina pectoris in Spain.

Authors:  Alvaro Hidalgo-Vega; Juan Manuel Ramos-Goñi; Renata Villoro
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-12

9.  Do economic evaluations of targeted therapy provide support for decision makers?

Authors:  Ilia L Ferrusi; Natasha B Leighl; Nathalie A Kulin; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 10.  Methods in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.