Literature DB >> 10347518

A comparative study of an alternating air mattress for the prevention of pressure ulcers in surgical patients.

S A Aronovitch1, M Wilber, S Slezak, T Martin, D Utter.   

Abstract

Research indicates that 8.5% of all patients undergoing surgical procedures for more than 3 hours develop pressure ulcers. In some types of surgery, incidence rates in excess of 25% have been reported. An 11-month study was conducted on the safety and efficacy of an experimental alternating air device in comparison with a tertiary care facility's conventional practice. A series of 217 patients undergoing surgical procedures scheduled for a minimum of 3 hours were enrolled. No ulcers developed in the experimental group and 11 ulcers developed in seven patients in the control group (8.75% incidence rate). Of the 11 ulcers, one was Stage I, four were Stage II, and six were unstageable secondary to eschar. The difference between the groups is significant at the P = 0.005 level. Individuals who developed ulcers had a length of stay approximately 7 days longer than the hospital average for comparable patients who did not develop ulcers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10347518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage        ISSN: 0889-5899            Impact factor:   2.629


  13 in total

1.  International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Josephine Lovegrove; Paul Fulbrook; Sandra Miles
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-10

3.  Preventing iatrogenic facial pressure ulcers during spinal surgery: Prospective trial using a novel method and review of literature.

Authors:  Shahnawaz Haleem; Ruxandra Mihai; Dominique Andre Rothenfluh; Jeremy Reynolds
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Pressure ulcer prevention: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-04-01

5.  Alternative reactive support surfaces (non-foam and non-air-filled) for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 6.  The effect of pressure-relieving surfaces on the prevention of heel ulcers in a variety of settings: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gisella Nicosia; Angela E Gliatta; M Gail Woodbury; Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Elizabeth McInnes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Sally E M Bell-Syer; Jo C Dumville; Victoria Middleton; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-03

8.  Beds, overlays and mattresses for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Victoria Ramsden; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-10

9.  Reactive air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Vannessa Leung; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-07

10.  Foam surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.