Literature DB >> 10347334

Secundum atrial septal defect is a dynamic three-dimensional entity.

A Dall'Agata1, J McGhie, M A Taams, A H Cromme-Dijkhuis, S E Spitaels, C S Breburda, J R Roelandt, A J Bogers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic relevance of 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiography in the assessment of secundum atrial septum defect (ASD2). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (age 2 to 58 years) with an ASD2 were studied by transthoracic (n = 9) or transesophageal (n = 14) echocardiography for the acquisition of a 3D data set before undergoing surgical repair. Qualitative (location, shape, and structure) and quantitative (largest and smallest anteroposterior and superoinferior diameters) characteristics were analyzed and compared with surgical findings. Intraobserver and interobserver variability were assessed. The gross anatomy of the ASD2, shown by the 3D images, was confirmed by the surgeon in 21 of 23 patients, but the presence of membranous or fenestrated remnants of the valvula foramina ovalis in the defect was not optimally visualized in 7 patients. Three-dimensional echocardiography revealed changes in diameter and shape of the ASD2 during the cardiac cycle. The measured largest and smallest anteroposterior diameters and their intraobserver and interobserver agreement were 274 +/- 12 mm, r = 0. 95 (P <.001), r = 0.92 (P <.001), and 194 +/- 9 mm, r = 0.96 (P <. 001), r = 0.94 (P <.001), respectively. The measured largest and smallest superoinferior diameter and their intraobserver and interobserver agreement were 304 +/- 26 mm, r = 0.90 (P <.001), r = 0.97 (P <.001), and 204 +/- 10 mm, r = 0.83 (P <.001), r = 0.84 ( P <.001), respectively. The correlation coefficient between 2D and 3D echocardiography for the largest anteroposterior and superoinferior diameter was r = 0.69 (P <.001) and r = 0.68 (P =.05), respectively. The correlation coefficient between the measurements from 3D reconstructions and direct surgical measurements was r = 0.20 (P = not significant) and r = 0.57 (P <.05), whereas between 2D and surgery was r = 0.50 (P <.05) and r = 0.26 (P = not significant).
CONCLUSIONS: ASD2 has a complex morphology. Three-dimensional echocardiography provides better qualitative and quantitative information on its dynamic geometry, location, and extension as compared with standard 2D echocardiography and might be useful for device selection during catheter-based closure of ASD2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10347334     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70365-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  6 in total

Review 1.  Transoesophageal echocardiography during interventional cardiac catheterisation in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  M L Rigby
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Assessment of atrial septum morphology by live three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Lingyun Fang; Mingxing Xie; Xinfang Wang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2007-12

3.  Percutaneous closure of complex atrial septum defect guided by real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  F Dodos; Uta C Hoppe
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Assessment of atrial septal defect size and residual rim using real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Kyoko Kaku; Masaaki Takeuchi; Lissa Sugeng; Joseph A Lodato; Hiromi Nakai; Lynn Weinert; Kyoko Otani; Hidetoshi Yoshitani; Nobuhiko Haruki; Ziyad M Hijazi; Yutaka Otsuji; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-07-14

5.  Assessment of the geometric profile of the Amplatzer and Cardioseal septal occluders by three dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  P Acar; Z Saliba; P Bonhoeffer; D Sidi; J Kachaner
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Three- and four-dimensional reconstruction of intra-cardiac anatomy from two-dimensional magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  M E Miquel; D L G Hill; E J Baker; S A Qureshi; R D B Simon; S F Keevil; R S Razavi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.