Literature DB >> 10345565

The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research.

R S Barbour1.   

Abstract

A judicious combination of qualitative and quantitative methods can play a valuable role in health services research. This paper reviews the main reasons for combining methods: for different stages in a project; to compensate for the shortcomings of individual methods; and for the purpose of 'triangulation'. It examines the potential for qualitative approaches to contribute to quantitative work--by providing insights into the process of data construction, identifying relevant variables to be studied, furnishing explanations for unexpected or anomalous findings, and generating hypotheses or research questions for further investigation. Similarly, qualitative work can be enhanced by using quantitative techniques--albeit often in a modified form--in analysing data, developing sampling strategies, and amalgamating findings from separate qualitative studies. Although there is potential to develop multi-method approaches, there remains an important role for rigorous studies employing either qualitative or quantitative methods.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10345565     DOI: 10.1177/135581969900400110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  45 in total

Review 1.  How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research.

Authors:  K J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Error reduction, complex systems and organizational change.

Authors:  A L Suchman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?

Authors:  R S Barbour
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-05

4.  Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Use of simulation in the study of clinician workflow.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Borycki; Andre W Kushniruk; Shige Kuwata; Joseph Kannry
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  Modeling the bullying prevention program preferences of educators: a discrete choice conjoint experiment.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Tracy Vaillancourt; Heather Rimas; Ken Deal; Lesley Cunningham; Kathy Short; Yvonne Chen
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-10

7.  Qualitative social research in addictions publishing: Creating an enabling journal environment.

Authors:  Tim Rhodes; Gerry V Stimson; David Moore; Philippe Bourgois
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2010-11-03

8.  Collaborative practices in unscheduled emergency care: role and impact of the emergency care practitioner--qualitative and summative findings.

Authors:  Simon Cooper; Judith O'Carroll; Annie Jenkin; Beryl Badger
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Status, challenges and facilitators of consumer involvement in Australian health and medical research.

Authors:  Carla Saunders; Afaf Girgis
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2010-11-18

10.  Providing information to parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint analysis of professional preferences.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Yvonne Chen; Don H Buchanan; Kathie Sdao-Jarvie
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2009-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.