Literature DB >> 10345515

Smoky bars and restaurants: who avoids them and why?

L Biener1, G Fitzgerald.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to provide new insight into who avoids smoky places, the types of places they avoid, and the reasons they give. A representative sample of Massachusetts adults (N = 4,929) was surveyed by telephone during 1995 and 1996. Forty-six percent of non-smokers reported having avoided a smoky place. Reasons were aversion to the lingering smell (34.8%) and health issues (31.9%). Many adults avoid restaurants and bars because of the expectation of excessive environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Patronage may increase after smoke-free policies are implemented and nonsmokers become aware of the opportunity to dine in establishments free of ETS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10345515     DOI: 10.1097/00124784-199901000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract        ISSN: 1078-4659


  8 in total

1.  Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA).

Authors:  J F Chriqui; M Frosh; R C Brownson; D M Shelton; R C Sciandra; R Hobart; P H Fisher; R el Arculli; M H Alciati
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry.

Authors:  M Scollo; A Lal; A Hyland; S Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Effect of smoke-free policies on the behaviour of social smokers.

Authors:  S J Philpot; S A Ryan; L E Torre; H M Wilcox; G Jalleh; K Jamrozik
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Smoking, occupancy and staffing levels in a selection of Dublin pubs pre and post a national smoking ban, lessons for all.

Authors:  M McCaffrey; P G Goodman; K Kelleher; L Clancy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  The first decade of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program.

Authors:  Howard K Koh; Christine M Judge; Harriet Robbins; Carolyn Cobb Celebucki; Deborah K Walker; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Tobacco industry strategies to minimize or mask cigarette smoke: opportunities for tobacco product regulation.

Authors:  Ryan David Kennedy; Rachel A Millstein; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Secondhand smoke in Pennsylvania casinos: a study of nonsmokers' exposure, dose, and risk.

Authors:  James L Repace
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Air pollution in Boston bars before and after a smoking ban.

Authors:  James L Repace; James N Hyde; Doug Brugge
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.