Literature DB >> 10344920

Development of an economic model for the management of upper gastrointestinal disease in primary care. Preliminary findings.

A Haycox1, M Butterworth, T Walley, S Barton.   

Abstract

Health economic models for identifying therapeutic options that maximise health benefits from limited healthcare resources are being developed in a number of therapeutic areas. The development of such a model for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms to support decision-making by primary care clinicians is of particular importance, given the prevalence of this symptomatology. This economic model was based upon the clinical guidelines aimed at improving the management of UGI disorders at the primary care level that were developed by the International Gastro Primary Care Group. This paper discusses the derivation, methodology and results of the economic model developed to assess the resource implications arising from these clinical guidelines. In order to construct the economic model, it was necessary to identify the following: every therapeutic pathway followed by patients resource use along each pathway the probabilities of following alternative pathways. One crucial factor underlying the interpretation of results obtained from any economic model is the time period covered by the model. The model presented here analysed the initial 12-month treatment period of 'new' patients presenting with UGI symptoms. In order to test the implications of a longer term perspective, the model is currently being developed to analyse resource use over a 24-month period. The model demonstrates that utilising the predominant symptom approach to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with UGI disorders appears to provide significant benefits in terms of patient management and effective resource use. This factor, together with the more intensive use of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, provides the potential to reduce the cost of drugs for the treatment of UGI disorders by approximately 15% in the UK. A major strength of the model is its adaptability to a wide range of clinical and cost scenarios. Such adaptability enables the model to effectively reflect the potential resource implications in countries exhibiting significantly different levels of cost and patient management. In this manner, the model provides one valuable method by which clinicians can be supported in optimising the management of UGI disorders within current resource constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10344920     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199814002-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  25 in total

Review 1.  Dyspepsia in general practice.

Authors:  C Brown; W D Rees
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-03-31

Review 2.  Beyond guidelines: promoting clinical change in the real world.

Authors:  R Eve; I Golton; P Hodgkin; J Munro; G Musson
Journal:  J Manag Med       Date:  1996

3.  Methodological and conduct principles for pharmacoeconomic research. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

Authors:  K Clemens; R Townsend; F Luscombe; J Mauskopf; J Osterhaus; J Bobula
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Avoiding bias in the conduct and reporting of cost-effectiveness research sponsored by pharmaceutical companies.

Authors:  A L Hillman; J M Eisenberg; M V Pauly; B S Bloom; H Glick; B Kinosian; J S Schwartz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Dyspepsia: incidence of a non-ulcer disease in a controlled trial of ranitidine in general practice.

Authors:  J H Saunders; R J Oliver; D L Higson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-08

6.  Promoting cost effective prescribing.

Authors:  N Freemantle; D Henry; A Maynard; G Torrance
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-15

7.  Economic analysis of health care technology. A report on principles. Task Force on Principles for Economic Analysis of Health Care Technology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Prevalences of endoscopic and histological findings in subjects with and without dyspepsia.

Authors:  R Johnsen; B Bernersen; B Straume; O H Førde; L Bostad; P G Burhol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-30

9.  Open-access endoscopy service for general practitioners.

Authors:  G Holdstock; M Wiseman; C A Loehry
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-02-17

10.  The profession of medicine.

Authors:  K Calman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-29
View more
  4 in total

1.  Computer modelling. The need for careful evaluation and public audit.

Authors:  A Maynard; R F Cookson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  How should Helicobacter pylori negative patients be managed?

Authors:  V Stanghellini; C Tosetti; R De Giorgio; G Barbara; B Salvioli; R Corinaldesi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Modelling different approaches to the management of upper gastrointestinal disease.

Authors:  A K Duggan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.981

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.