BACKGROUND: Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) giving rise to lower urinary tract symptomatology (LUTS) has emerged as the mainstay for first-line therapy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most important method of detecting prostate carcinoma. The effect of finasteride on PSA has been widely reported. Little data exist with respect to alpha-adrenergic blocking therapy in men treated for BPH. In the present investigation we set out to evaluate the effect of these two forms of therapy. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the VA Cooperative Study #359 trial were evaluated. This study evaluated men with moderate LUTS owing to BPH in four treatment groups: placebo (P), finasteride (F), terazosin (T), and combination of finasteride plus terazosin (C). Men were recruited at 31 VA medical centers and had a baseline in 52-week PSA determination at the respective sites. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline PSA between four groups (mean range, 2.0-2.9 ng/ml). Statistically significant reduction in PSA levels was observed at 52 weeks in the F and C arms (P < 0.001), whereas significant increases were observed in the T and P arms (P < 0.01). Additionally, there was no significant difference in PSA response between the T and P arms. Thirty percent of men in the C or F arms had more than 40-60% reduction of PSA. In contrast, the majority of men on T or P had less than 40% change in PSA. Only 35% of men on F or C had the expected 40-60% reduction in PSA level. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate no clinically significant effect of T on PSA level. The heterogeneity of PSA response to F may make monitoring patients for the development of prostate cancer problematic.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) giving rise to lower urinary tract symptomatology (LUTS) has emerged as the mainstay for first-line therapy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most important method of detecting prostate carcinoma. The effect of finasteride on PSA has been widely reported. Little data exist with respect to alpha-adrenergic blocking therapy in men treated for BPH. In the present investigation we set out to evaluate the effect of these two forms of therapy. METHODS:Patients enrolled in the VA Cooperative Study #359 trial were evaluated. This study evaluated men with moderate LUTS owing to BPH in four treatment groups: placebo (P), finasteride (F), terazosin (T), and combination of finasteride plus terazosin (C). Men were recruited at 31 VA medical centers and had a baseline in 52-week PSA determination at the respective sites. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline PSA between four groups (mean range, 2.0-2.9 ng/ml). Statistically significant reduction in PSA levels was observed at 52 weeks in the F and C arms (P < 0.001), whereas significant increases were observed in the T and P arms (P < 0.01). Additionally, there was no significant difference in PSA response between the T and P arms. Thirty percent of men in the C or F arms had more than 40-60% reduction of PSA. In contrast, the majority of men on T or P had less than 40% change in PSA. Only 35% of men on F or C had the expected 40-60% reduction in PSA level. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate no clinically significant effect of T on PSA level. The heterogeneity of PSA response to F may make monitoring patients for the development of prostate cancer problematic.
Authors: Koenraad van Renterghem; Gommert Van Koeveringe; Ruth Achten; Philip van Kerrebroeck Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2009-06-03 Impact factor: 2.370