Literature DB >> 10343937

EEMCO guidance for the assessment of skin topography. The European Expert Group on Efficacy Measurement of Cosmetics and other Topical Products.

J L Lévêque1.   

Abstract

Numerous factors can modify the visibility or the actual dimensions of the skin microrelief and wrinkles. To quantify these changes, several methods, including clinical and non-invasive ones, have been proposed. This article reviews the advantages et drawbacks of all of them and lists some experimental recommendations to make the results of studies using these methods, more reliable.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol        ISSN: 0926-9959            Impact factor:   6.166


  4 in total

1.  Interrelationships between Skin Structure, Function, and Microbiome of Pregnant Females and Their Newborns: Study Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Doris Wilborn; Jan Kottner; Kathrin Hillmann; Sa Xu; Frank Konietschke; Ulrike Blume-Peytavi
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2021-11-17

2.  The weather-beaten dorsal hand clinical rating, shadow casting optical profilometry, and skin capacitance mapping.

Authors:  Marie Delvenne; Claudine Piérard-Franchimont; Laurence Seidel; Adelin Albert; Gérald E Piérard
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Wrinkle reduction in post-menopausal women consuming a novel oral supplement: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study.

Authors:  G Jenkins; L J Wainwright; R Holland; K E Barrett; J Casey
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.970

Review 4.  Scar Assessment Tools: How Do They Compare?

Authors:  Amanda Min Hui Choo; Yee Siang Ong; Fadi Issa
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-06-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.