Literature DB >> 10343881

Angioscotoma detection with fundus-oriented perimetry. A study with dark and bright stimuli of different sizes.

U Schiefer1, N Benda, T J Dietrich, B Selig, C Hofmann, J Schiller.   

Abstract

Fundus-oriented perimetry (FOP) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of different-sized bright and dark stimuli in detecting and quantitatively measuring angioscotoma. The foveolas and optic disks of digitized fundus images were aligned with their psychophysical counterparts to construct individual grids of perimetric stimuli. Each grid included a linear set of test point locations crossing a retinal vessel. Angioscotomas immediately became visible in nine of 13 healthy normal volunteers tested with FOP. Additional mathematical processing of local loss of differential light sensitivity (dls) disclosed an angioscotoma for at least one stimulus condition in all persons tested. The angioscomas were usually deeper for small (12) targets than for large (32') ones. On the other hand, the overall noise at dls thresholds was generally higher for small than for large stimuli regardless of whether the stimuli were bright or dark. No noteworthy differences were found in detection rates or signal-to-noise ratios under different stimulus conditions (dark/bright/small/large). FOP permits the individual arrangement of stimuli for specific morphological conditions and is thus capable of detecting even minute visual field defects such as angioscotomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343881     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00295-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  The cortical representation of shadows cast by retinal blood vessels.

Authors:  J C Horton; D L Adams
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2000

2.  Shadows cast by retinal blood vessels mapped in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Daniel L Adams; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry.

Authors:  P Brusini; M L Salvetat; L Parisi; M Zeppieri
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope-based microperimetry.

Authors:  William S Tuten; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Macular function in macular degenerations: repeatability of microperimetry as a potential outcome measure for ABCA4-associated retinopathy trials.

Authors:  Artur V Cideciyan; Malgorzata Swider; Tomas S Aleman; Willam J Feuer; Sharon B Schwartz; Robert C Russell; Janet D Steinberg; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Assessing Visual Fields in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa Using a Novel Microperimeter with Eye Tracking: The MP-3.

Authors:  Nozomi Igarashi; Masato Matsuura; Yohei Hashimoto; Kazunori Hirasawa; Hiroshi Murata; Tatsuya Inoue; Obata Ryo; Makoto Aihara; Ryo Asaoka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Customizing Perimetric Locations Based on En Face Images of Retinal Nerve Fiber Bundles With Glaucomatous Damage.

Authors:  Muhammed S Alluwimi; William H Swanson; Victor E Malinovsky; Brett J King
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Carlo Aleci; Tiziana Usai
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2008-11-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.