Literature DB >> 10343857

Temporal sensitivity of human luminance pattern mechanisms determined by masking with temporally modulated stimuli.

G M Boynton1, J M Foley.   

Abstract

Target contrast thresholds were measured using vertical spatial Gabor targets in the presence of full field maskers of the same spatial frequency and orientation. In the first experiment both target and masker were 2 cpd. The target was modulated at a frequency of 1 or 10 Hz and the maskers varied in temporal frequency from 1 to 30 Hz and in contrast from 0.03 to 0.50. In the second experiment both target and masker had a spatial frequency of 1, 5 or 8 cpd. The target was modulated at 7.5 Hz and the same set of maskers was used as in the first experiment. The results are not consistent with a widely used model that is based on mechanisms in which excitation is summed linearly and the sum is transformed by an S-shaped nonlinear excitation-response function. A new model of human pattern vision mechanisms, which has excitatory and divisive inhibitory inputs, describes the results well. Parameters from the best fit of the new model to the results of the first experiment show that the 1 Hz and 10 Hz targets were detected by mechanisms with temporal low-pass and band-pass excitatory sensitivity, respectively. Fits to the second experiment suggest that at 1 cpd, the excitatory tuning of the detecting mechanism is band-pass. At 5 and 8 cpd, the mechanisms are excited by a broad range of temporal frequencies. Mechanism sensitivity to divisive inhibition depends on temporal frequency in the same general way as sensitivity to excitation. Mechanisms are more broadly tuned to divisive inhibition than to excitation, except when the target temporal frequency is high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343857     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00199-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Normalization models applied to orientation masking in the human infant.

Authors:  T R Candy; A M Skoczenski; A M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The divisive normalization model of V1 neurons: a comprehensive comparison of physiological data and model predictions.

Authors:  Tadamasa Sawada; Alexander A Petrov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Local Interactions between Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials at Nearby Flickering Frequencies.

Authors:  Kumari Liza; Supratim Ray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Orientation bandwidths are invariant across spatiotemporal frequency after isotropic components are removed.

Authors:  John Cass; Sjoerd Stuit; Peter Bex; David Alais
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Farshad Moradi; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Temporal whitening: transient noise perceptually equalizes the 1/f temporal amplitude spectrum.

Authors:  John Cass; David Alais; Branka Spehar; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  What is the primary cause of individual differences in contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Daniel H Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Broadband noise masks suppress neural responses to narrowband stimuli.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Greta Vilidaitė
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-15

9.  Interaction between steady-state visually evoked potentials at nearby flicker frequencies.

Authors:  Siddhesh Salelkar; Supratim Ray
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.